1 - 10 Next
The Congress (House of Representatives) needs to do only ONE THING to drag all this garbage back into line. REFUSE TO ALLOW ANY OF THEM ANY MONEY!!! The House controls the Purse String ... So ... CONTROL THEM! Take away the CASH!!! Starve the various Agencies, Departments, Czars and ... ESPECIALLY ... starve the Administration ...
The House of Representatives "controls the purse-strings". Several millions of dollars are being spent to "accommodate" these illegals. Where are these several millions coming from? I understand that the Senate won't put forward anything coming out of the House. So the House has to use the strength it has and just shut off the money supply. SOMEBODY is approving the money that Obama is spending ... as well as the EPA, the IRS, the Federal Gov in General ... TAKE AWAY THEIR FINANCIAL RESOURCES ... and then see how long they continue.
Once again peole are trying to make like this is a mistake someone made. Like its a "whoopsie!". It is not and the evidence is plain. They are transporting these illegals all over the country and dropping them off or stashing them in every out of the way place they can come up with. Its not really about the Border ... its about how this Administration and Our Current Government is ensuring that these people are fully infiltrated throughout the country. Its about how they are going to make it completely impossible to weed the people out and send them home. There should be a few massive naval ships parked up in Texas and Southern Cal and, as fast as these people are rounded up, they should be delivered immediately to these ships until the ships reach capacity. Once these ships get to the point of being full, they should cast off and next touch land in a port of the country that these people came from and then they should be herded off like sheep. Family, relatives and friends could pick them up down at the harbor. However ... I would note that the ships carrying the people back should be backed up by a couple serious warships so that the various government could not refuse to take back their refuse.
In response to:

Who Owns You?

Bay0Wulf Wrote: Jun 11, 2014 8:08 AM
Yeah ... statins ... Its not that they get a kickback ... its that it is the panacea that is suggested. Doctors, if you fall into a certain range, will try to get you on them because, if for no other reason, it covers their tails against getting sued. If they didn't offer or suggest, then there might be a legal opening.
In response to:

Who Owns You?

Bay0Wulf Wrote: Jun 11, 2014 8:03 AM
Take a look at Tylenol. (acetaminophen) ... prime killer. Here's one for you ... several of the junkies that are getting torn apart by drugs are getting torn apart by the acetaminophen that's in it (like tylenol 3 or Oxycodone or ...) ... not the actual narcotic.
In response to:

Who Owns You?

Bay0Wulf Wrote: Jun 11, 2014 8:00 AM
Hey ... If I were "terminal" or suffering from a "progressive disease" (no ... not Liberalism) I would want the CHOICE. I would sign whatever waiver indemnifying the drug mfg., the Doc, the hosp ... everyone (except maybe a VERY small tort clause to keep them "reasonably honest") and be willing to take my chances. I was almost killed by a painkiller once after some major surgery. It was new. It worked well. It was non-narcotic. I had one heck of an allergic response to it suddenly after taking it for weeks. It is off the market. It never occurred to me to "sue" ... it was great. It worked great. Until it didn't.
In response to:

Who Owns You?

Bay0Wulf Wrote: Jun 11, 2014 7:52 AM
I believe that once a person is listed as "terminal" there should be no cure or potential cure that is left untried (assuming the patient agrees & signs off on the treatment & signs a VERY limited "tort" agreement). I don't see this as a license for Medical Professionals or Pharma to start practicing voodoo medicine, but if there is a drug out there that truly shows promise, it should not be withheld because the FDA is screwing around with it. This would have the added benefit of providing some human testing in the process. I also think that various "alternative" or "homeopathic" drugs should be available to "terminal" patients. Not for nothing but ... what could it possibly do? Kill them? If I were terminal I would want the choice.
In response to:

Libertarians Versus Conservatives

Bay0Wulf Wrote: Jun 11, 2014 7:41 AM
I think that it is OK that we remain the World's Primary Military Provider. I also think it is OK that we act as the "International Police Force". I DON'T THINK that we should be doing it for "free". We are going to continue to have a strong volunteer military (BHO will be thrown out sooner or later) and these men and women NEED to have some "real-time" experience. It costs us tremendous amounts of money to keep Our Military and there are many countries out there who are happy to have us around to keep THEM safe (except when they're burning Our Flag). There must be a way to get these people to pay for the luxury of not having their OWN Military because they are hiding under Ours. I can think of several ways to get them to pay us for this service. Guarding their seas against pirates, their shores, their countries COSTS US. I don't want us to become mercenaries (to the highest bidder) but these people should be defraying ... 75 to 90% of Our Costs. This would enable us to continue to have a very high caliber military, continue to afford the new technologies, continue to "project" Our Presence and continue to quell things from getting out of hand. It would also allow us to be available for disater assistance worldwide. No other Police Force in the History of the World has worked for "free" why should we?
Oh wait ... another ignoramus heard from ... I'm sure you were guzzling the "Global Warming" kool-aid when it was being expounded by know-nothing "Climatologists" who have been prove to be A. WRONG and B. LYING and C. Highly Biased. So now you've switched to Guzzling the Gatorade of "Climate Change" or ... "Global ... We Haven't Gotta Clue but There's Money in Them There Bills!". The "original science" used proved to be faulty and deliberately misrepresented. The NEW "Eco-Horror Show" is equally as bad. If you spent a little bit of time doing some of your own research on the subject (assuming you are of sufficient intelligence to do so) you would find that every one of the "proofs" being offered are baseless and skewed. In fact, if you paid attention at all, you would find that after all the facts have been carefully tabulated and weighed that even NOAA has to admit that all these weather "extremes" are actually NOT "Record Setting" in fact, like it or not, all these "extreme weather" events have added up to a pretty mild set of statistics. I think you confuse the various "Weather" channel's desperate attempt to fill their time slots with whatever "news" they can find with some sort of science. The fact that they can broadcast for hours every anomaly makes it all seem like something new and drastic is happening when all that's really happening is that "weather reporters" now have hundreds of new ways to see things that usually went unnoticed. Kind of ... if a tornado occurs and it takes a week to get there to do a report, is it worth having gone? Did it actually happen?
Unfortunately I think if Obama had urged anyone from any other nation to do anything ... they would have rightfully laughed in his face. This president and his secretary of state has made a joke out of Our Country. Between the two of them they have as many "teeth" as my 90 year old grandmother did when her dentures were out. Actually, I think she had more "teeth" than they do even then.
1 - 10 Next