No ... they want mankind to find some other place to exist because everywhere we go and anything we do as a species we "impact" on something else. The true answer to their requirement list is that Homo Sapiens as a species should cease to exist so that True Nature can revert to its original way of doing things. As climate changed (naturally) some animals came in and ate the other animals (or otherwise killed them or drove them off) and the new animal took over. This, of course, had no impact on the animals who were eaten or otherwise displaced

No ... they want mankind to find some other place to exist because everywhere we go and anything we do as a species we "impact" on something else. The true answer to their requirement list is that Homo Sapiens as a species should cease to exist so that True Nature can revert to its original way of doing things. As climate changed (naturally) some animals came in and ate the other animals (or otherwise killed them or drove them off) and the new animal took over. This, of course, had no impact on the animals who were eaten or otherwise displaced

I like the "Dusky Frog" aspect of this article. In the early 70's I was a victim (at 16) of "Affirmative Action" requirements. I was terminated from my job because the company was required to have a position open in case a Black person needed a job ... the company was 90% Hispanic ... The town and area had no "Black People" and to this day has very few. Up to that time I thought overt prejudice was stupid ... coming from Maine the form of prejudice up there is "People from Other Places vs. People with a Canadian Background" (& a French sounding last name) which was just ... stupid. After the run in with the Affirmative Action Law, I still considered overt prejudice stupid but I could understand its basis. Like the Dusky Frog scenario ..

I like the "Dusky Frog" aspect of this article. In the early 70's I was a victim (at 16) of "Affirmative Action" requirements. I was terminated from my job because the company was required to have a position open in case a Black person needed a job ... the company was 90% Hispanic ... The town and area had no "Black People" and to this day has very few. Up to that time I thought overt prejudice was stupid ... coming from Maine the form of prejudice up there is "People from Other Places vs. People with a Canadian Background" (& a French sounding last name) which was just ... stupid. After the run in with the Affirmative Action Law, I still considered overt prejudice stupid but I could understand its basis. Like the Dusky Frog scenario ..

Look the folks at the EPA and all the agitators are doing their job and expanding their roles. That's one of the things that Government is good at, creating a monkey and then sitting back and watching it turn into a 1000 pound gorilla and then blaming the People for the fact there's a 1000 pound gorilla in the swimming pool.

Just call them CRIMINALS ... They broke several laws getting here. They are breaking several laws staying here. Then, a large percentage break even MORE unrelated laws. Isn't someone who breaks the law (not to mention several) a CRIMINAL and supposed to be a FUGITIVE FROM JUSTICE? Aren't there laws against aiding and abetting FUGITIVES? So ... can't we go after the people who hire them, rent to them, assist them ... and the Government, State, City &/or Towns who assist them in ANY way for "Aiding and Abetting a Fugitive" (or several)?

Just call them CRIMINALS ... They broke several laws getting here. They are breaking several laws staying here. Then, a large percentage break even MORE unrelated laws. Isn't someone who breaks the law (not to mention several) a CRIMINAL and supposed to be a FUGITIVE FROM JUSTICE? Aren't there laws against aiding and abetting FUGITIVES?

Call the CRIMINALS!!!!

Really? You can't write Wet Back? Since when? How about Criminals? Wow! written as one word it WAS flagged as "Inappropriate Language"

Okay ... so the "Lame Stream" doesn't like "Illegal" (Immigrant) or "Undocumented" (Worker / Immigrant). Could we please just go back to calling them CRIMINALS?