1 - 10 Next
Just Food for Thought ... the Concept of "Peaceful Muslims" ... Although there are many who call themselves "Peaceful Muslims" and there are many who actually refer to some as "Peaceful Muslims" ... including the media in many version .... "Peaceful Muslims" are not actualy "Muslims" from the point of view of Islam as a Socio-Political-Theology they are simply used as a vanguard ... an icebreaker ... into a sleeping society. Those "Peaceful Muslims" are the Islamic version of cannon fodder. Once they have lulled the local population and paved the way for the more "Orthodox" (Radical) Muslims to move into place, they are as likely to be eliminated by MUSLIMS as by anyone else. This happens to be true and is fully supported by the Qu'ran and general Islamic Philosophy. Peaceful Muslims are the Islamic verion of "Useful Idiots". If they actually rose up in protest of the things the "Radical Muslims" were doing, they would find themselves being killed off (and their families) out of hand. "Peaceful Muslims" HAVE NO CHOICE but to keep their heads down and their mouths shut ... they are already on the list to be eliminated by their own "Faith" (Socio-Political-Theology)
Because "Peaceful Muslims" are not actualy "Muslims" from the point of view of Islam as a Socio-Political-Theology they are simply used as a vanguard ... an icebreaker ... into a sleeping society. Those "Peaceful Muslims" are the Islamic version of cannon fodder. Once they have lulled the local population and paved the way for the more "Orthodox" (Radical) Muslims to move into place, they are as likely to be eliminated by MUSLIMS as by anyone else. Peaceful Muslims are the Ilamic verion of "Useful Idiots". If they actually rose up in protest of the things the "Radical Muslims" were doing, they would find themselves being killed off (and their families) out of hand. "Peaceful Muslims" HAVE NO CHOICE but to keep their heads down and their mouths shut ... they are already on the list to be eliminated by their own "Faith" (Socio-Political-Theology)
It seems to me that you are trying to say that there is more to the racism question than this one incident in Ferguson. You might be right, there may have been other incidents of racism. White vs Black, White vs. White, Black vs. Black, Hispanic vs. Hispanic ... Racism does exist and will exist forever everywhere whether it is overt or or only in a passing thought. Like tends to stick with like. Baptists don't care much for Protestants who don't care much for Catholics. Crows don't care much for Bluejays. No Culture actually fully embraces another. Using something like the occurance in Ferguson to promote or somehow say (or insinuate) that it is OK that people riot out of control is NOT OK. Trying to say that maybe the means justifies the end (the community riots because they think an injustice has been done) is NOT OK. The article says that "Accountability is Dead" and ... the article is largely correct. In all the cases over the last several years of rioting and looting and other incidents of similar nature ... NO-ONE has been taken to task. NO-ONE has been excoriated and incarcerated and thrown into a deep dark hole ... right ... we DON'T HAVE "deep dark holes" ... Our Penal System strikes pretty much everyone in it as some sort of "Bad" Boy's Club, as some sort of odd Private School ... and to those from other Nation's who wind up in OUR Penal System? Heck ... they actually seem to think its an odd version of Club Med ... a freaking Country Club. It doesn't matter how you try to justify it, there is NO EXCUSE for the kind of riots that have occurred all over this Nation ... the latest being in Feguson.
The Congress (House of Representatives) needs to do only ONE THING to drag all this garbage back into line. REFUSE TO ALLOW ANY OF THEM ANY MONEY!!! The House controls the Purse String ... So ... CONTROL THEM! Take away the CASH!!! Starve the various Agencies, Departments, Czars and ... ESPECIALLY ... starve the Administration ...
The House of Representatives "controls the purse-strings". Several millions of dollars are being spent to "accommodate" these illegals. Where are these several millions coming from? I understand that the Senate won't put forward anything coming out of the House. So the House has to use the strength it has and just shut off the money supply. SOMEBODY is approving the money that Obama is spending ... as well as the EPA, the IRS, the Federal Gov in General ... TAKE AWAY THEIR FINANCIAL RESOURCES ... and then see how long they continue.
Once again peole are trying to make like this is a mistake someone made. Like its a "whoopsie!". It is not and the evidence is plain. They are transporting these illegals all over the country and dropping them off or stashing them in every out of the way place they can come up with. Its not really about the Border ... its about how this Administration and Our Current Government is ensuring that these people are fully infiltrated throughout the country. Its about how they are going to make it completely impossible to weed the people out and send them home. There should be a few massive naval ships parked up in Texas and Southern Cal and, as fast as these people are rounded up, they should be delivered immediately to these ships until the ships reach capacity. Once these ships get to the point of being full, they should cast off and next touch land in a port of the country that these people came from and then they should be herded off like sheep. Family, relatives and friends could pick them up down at the harbor. However ... I would note that the ships carrying the people back should be backed up by a couple serious warships so that the various government could not refuse to take back their refuse.
In response to:

Who Owns You?

Bay0Wulf Wrote: Jun 11, 2014 8:08 AM
Yeah ... statins ... Its not that they get a kickback ... its that it is the panacea that is suggested. Doctors, if you fall into a certain range, will try to get you on them because, if for no other reason, it covers their tails against getting sued. If they didn't offer or suggest, then there might be a legal opening.
In response to:

Who Owns You?

Bay0Wulf Wrote: Jun 11, 2014 8:03 AM
Take a look at Tylenol. (acetaminophen) ... prime killer. Here's one for you ... several of the junkies that are getting torn apart by drugs are getting torn apart by the acetaminophen that's in it (like tylenol 3 or Oxycodone or ...) ... not the actual narcotic.
In response to:

Who Owns You?

Bay0Wulf Wrote: Jun 11, 2014 8:00 AM
Hey ... If I were "terminal" or suffering from a "progressive disease" (no ... not Liberalism) I would want the CHOICE. I would sign whatever waiver indemnifying the drug mfg., the Doc, the hosp ... everyone (except maybe a VERY small tort clause to keep them "reasonably honest") and be willing to take my chances. I was almost killed by a painkiller once after some major surgery. It was new. It worked well. It was non-narcotic. I had one heck of an allergic response to it suddenly after taking it for weeks. It is off the market. It never occurred to me to "sue" ... it was great. It worked great. Until it didn't.
In response to:

Who Owns You?

Bay0Wulf Wrote: Jun 11, 2014 7:52 AM
I believe that once a person is listed as "terminal" there should be no cure or potential cure that is left untried (assuming the patient agrees & signs off on the treatment & signs a VERY limited "tort" agreement). I don't see this as a license for Medical Professionals or Pharma to start practicing voodoo medicine, but if there is a drug out there that truly shows promise, it should not be withheld because the FDA is screwing around with it. This would have the added benefit of providing some human testing in the process. I also think that various "alternative" or "homeopathic" drugs should be available to "terminal" patients. Not for nothing but ... what could it possibly do? Kill them? If I were terminal I would want the choice.
1 - 10 Next