In response to:

The Libertarian Case for Life

Basset Hound Wrote: Apr 02, 2013 1:14 PM
If you believe a stronger person's circumstances determine if a weaker person lives or dies, then you are NOT a libertarian, but an anarchist. Likewise if you believe an unborn child is chattel and property.
Texas Chris Wrote: Apr 02, 2013 2:31 PM
An anarchist only believes in society without government. A libertarian believes coercion is immoral. The two are compatible, as a person can believe government should not exist as well as that the initiation of violence is acceptable only in self defense. But a libertarian is not anti-government, he is simply anti-coercion. A voluntarist.

At this year’s Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC), I was invited to participate on a panel called "The Future of the Movement: Winning with Generation X/Y." I had a lot of ideas to discuss, including utilizing new messages to reach this new pro-life generation, recruiting more candidates with a willingness to stand up for what they believe in, developing new technology, and improving grassroots organizing, to name a few.

But, instead of focusing on the panel's extremely important topic, the moderator, Students for Liberty Co-Founder Alexander McCobin, decided to use his time to advance his libertarian ideal of legalizing gay marriage....