1 - 10 Next
You'd think that Democrats would want a special prosecutor to prove their own case that convservative groups were NOT targeted by the IRS. If they are so certain that it's true, then what's the harm?
When do we get the same "equal protection" that all the so-called protected groups are getting?
What Obama is scared of is that even low information voters might find out if he were to suddenly change his schedule in reaction to events, and then the MSM covers it.
In response to:

Federal Judge to Supreme Court: 'STFU'

Barsoom Wrote: Jul 07, 2014 12:11 PM
So Bush 1 gave us David Souter AND this guy?
How about they leave Reagan airport alone and rename the Redskins to the Washington Howards?
>> The only thing President Obama will be mitigating is politics and faux war on women rhetoric. Wrong. He's a narcissist. He can't abide by losing. He must find a way to be the victor in the end. It's personal to him. Nobody else can win, because he can't be a loser.
>>Any takers on what the third federal agency will be to accidentally “lose” relevant and potentially damaging internal emails? Homeland Security will be next, then Justice.
Liar... liar... liar... liar... liar... liar... liar... liar... liar... liar... liar... liar... liar...
Wow! A unanimous 4th amendment decision! What planet am I on?
Benson says: Neither of those requirements were apparently met with Lerner's emails. The agency basically admits to blowing off protocols in losing Lerner's emails... I think the opposite is true; protocols were followed. It's just that the IRS management who are testifying don't know the IT details and are passing along ignorant information. Congress needs to get a warrant and send in some forensic experts to begin tracing the emails back to their servers and server backups. Those copies are there, despite what IRS management says.
1 - 10 Next