Previous 11 - 20 Next
Can't we all agree that the same people calling Barack Hussein Obamao a Marxist today, would have been calling Martin Luther King a Communist back during the Civil Rights era? God Bless the United States of Amerika!
In response to:

Moving Ahead

barmderk Wrote: Nov 09, 2012 2:50 PM
The biggest supporters of segregation were and are Christian conservatives.
In response to:

Moving Ahead

barmderk Wrote: Nov 09, 2012 2:50 PM
Martin Luther King was against the Vietnam War, Martin Luther King was for nation building here at home. The Republican establishment today is for Neo-conservatism which wants to social engineer in foreign countries and nation build overseas. Today's Republican establishment puts America last and their corporate contributors first.
In response to:

Could Ronald Reagan Get Elected Today?

barmderk Wrote: Nov 09, 2012 2:47 PM
Chaffetz reveals an ongoing theme of Republican action since 2010 and that is not providing the needed resources on key areas then blaming the Administration when things go wrong. This poicy has effected too many of our vital needs and I suspect with a Republican House is still in place, we'll see massive cuts to the FDA, CDC, EPA and probably to air safety as well all so that when Americans die, people like Chaffetz can blame the President.
In response to:

Could Ronald Reagan Get Elected Today?

barmderk Wrote: Nov 09, 2012 2:47 PM
Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) acknowledged on Wednesday that House Republicans had consciously voted to reduce the funds allocated to the State Department for embassy security since winning the majority in 2010. For the past two years, House Republicans have continued to deprioritize the security forces protecting State Department personnel around the world. In fiscal year 2011, lawmakers shaved $128 million off of the administration's request for embassy security funding. House Republicans drained off even more funds in fiscal year 2012 -- cutting back on the department's request by $331 million.
Chaffetz reveals an ongoing theme of Republican action since 2010 and that is not providing the needed resources on key areas then blaming the Administration when things go wrong. This poicy has effected too many of our vital needs and I suspect with a Republican House is still in place, we'll see massive cuts to the FDA, CDC, EPA and probably to air safety as well all so that when Americans die, people like Chaffetz can blame the President.
Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) acknowledged on Wednesday that House Republicans had consciously voted to reduce the funds allocated to the State Department for embassy security since winning the majority in 2010. For the past two years, House Republicans have continued to deprioritize the security forces protecting State Department personnel around the world. In fiscal year 2011, lawmakers shaved $128 million off of the administration's request for embassy security funding. House Republicans drained off even more funds in fiscal year 2012 -- cutting back on the department's request by $331 million.
In response to:

Romney's Loss -- It's Not the Asphalt

barmderk Wrote: Nov 09, 2012 2:45 PM
Chaffetz reveals an ongoing theme of Republican action since 2010 and that is not providing the needed resources on key areas then blaming the Administration when things go wrong. This poicy has effected too many of our vital needs and I suspect with a Republican House is still in place, we'll see massive cuts to the FDA, CDC, EPA and probably to air safety as well all so that when Americans die, people like Chaffetz can blame the President.
In response to:

Romney's Loss -- It's Not the Asphalt

barmderk Wrote: Nov 09, 2012 2:45 PM
Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) acknowledged on Wednesday that House Republicans had consciously voted to reduce the funds allocated to the State Department for embassy security since winning the majority in 2010. For the past two years, House Republicans have continued to deprioritize the security forces protecting State Department personnel around the world. In fiscal year 2011, lawmakers shaved $128 million off of the administration's request for embassy security funding. House Republicans drained off even more funds in fiscal year 2012 -- cutting back on the department's request by $331 million.
In response to:

Mike Gallagher Show

barmderk Wrote: Nov 09, 2012 2:45 PM
Chaffetz reveals an ongoing theme of Republican action since 2010 and that is not providing the needed resources on key areas then blaming the Administration when things go wrong. This poicy has effected too many of our vital needs and I suspect with a Republican House is still in place, we'll see massive cuts to the FDA, CDC, EPA and probably to air safety as well all so that when Americans die, people like Chaffetz can blame the President.
In response to:

Mike Gallagher Show

barmderk Wrote: Nov 09, 2012 2:45 PM
Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) acknowledged on Wednesday that House Republicans had consciously voted to reduce the funds allocated to the State Department for embassy security since winning the majority in 2010. For the past two years, House Republicans have continued to deprioritize the security forces protecting State Department personnel around the world. In fiscal year 2011, lawmakers shaved $128 million off of the administration's request for embassy security funding. House Republicans drained off even more funds in fiscal year 2012 -- cutting back on the department's request by $331 million.
Previous 11 - 20 Next