In response to:

Why Republicans Are Poised To Lose The Second Amendment Battle

Barbara1328 Wrote: Jan 27, 2013 8:31 AM
And this is what happens when the uninformed, low intelligent voter puts the criminal politicians from Chicago in Washington.
Seawolf Wrote: Jan 27, 2013 8:54 AM
And those same voters will never give up their guns many of which were stolen from US in the first place. Disarming the rest of us gives the criminals a competitive edge, kinda like a new AA program.

I RESENT being forced to be looked upon as a criminal because some stupid limp-wristed,wuss of a politician who thinks he/she is better than the rest of us got a law passed which denies me the right to protect the only life I will ever have. They cannot do that unless WE let them..Any pol who advocates disarming law-abiding Americans in any way needs to be removed from office.

You have to give progressives credit. They’re nothing if not thorough. When an opportunity to limit the Second Amendment presented itself in the Sandy Hook massacre, regardless how tasteless it was to exploit that opportunity, they went full bore toward their goal.

Sen. Diane Feinstein, D-Calif., introduced sweeping so-called “assault weapons” ban legislation this week that would place unprecedented restrictions on individuals’ rights to own, use, sell and even pass along already owned firearms to family members. But given where things stand now in the polls and political atmosphere, that legislation will go nowhere.

But the Constitution and the...