In response to:

And They Wonder Why Voters Are Angry

Barbara1247 Wrote: Apr 06, 2012 4:42 PM
This is a trick question, right - since you are pre-emptively disqualifying Ron Paul. But since you insist that he's not an option, I'd go with Gary Johnson. None of the others are acceptable to me and will not get my vote. This is where you respond, "oh, so you're voting for Obama".
Account closed Wrote: Apr 06, 2012 5:53 PM
Gary Johnson sure put up a fight. He'd of done just fine against Obama and his MSM.
Ken6226 Wrote: Apr 06, 2012 5:46 PM
I don't Romney, but he's bound to be an improvement over Obama.
michael1819 Wrote: Apr 06, 2012 5:13 PM
Well a non vote for the Republican president will give Obama 4 more years. Now I suspect most of us will vote for the strongest conservative Senatorial and House Representatives we can. I am sure all of us conservatives will make every effort to get a veto proof majority in the Senate.
with this control in Congress it matters not who gets elected, but the process will be easier with Romney. At least he understands economics.

As Mitt Romney assumes the role of presumptive Republican nominee, polls suggest a competitive general election matchup between the former Massachusetts governor and President Obama. Typically, both candidates poll in the mid-40s, while 10 to 12 percent remain uncommitted to either side.

Among these uncommitted voters, Rasmussen Reports polling shows that just 22 percent approve of the way the president is handling his job. Seventy-two percent (72 percent) disapprove. As for intensity, just 2 percent strongly approve, and 40 percent strongly disapprove.

At first glance, this seems like good news for Romney. These uncommitted voters will be difficult for the president...

Thursday, June 20 | 02:32 AM ET
Thursday, June 20 | 02:32 AM ET
Thursday, June 20 | 02:32 AM ET
Thursday, June 20 | 02:32 AM ET