How can political commentators, politicians and academics get away with statements like "Reagan budget deficits," "Clinton budget surplus," "Bush budget deficits" or "Obama's tax increases"? The only answer is that they, or the people who believe such statements, are ignorant, conniving or just plain stupid. Article I, Section 7 of the U.S. Constitution reads: "All bills for raising revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with amendments as on other Bills." A president has no power to raise or lower taxes. He can propose tax measures or veto them but since Congress...
Join the Debate!
Login in to Post Your Comments
- EuroZone jobless rate hits new high Ed Morrissey 14 minutes ago
- What happens when a state no longer forces workers into a union? Ed Morrissey 54 minutes ago
- Dueling ads: “A Better Day” vs “Romney economics” Ed Morrissey 1 hour ago
- Clinton: Let’s stop attacking Romney’s “sterling business career,” mm-kay? Ed Morrissey 2 hours ago
- Jobs report: Only 69,000 jobs added, jobless rate rises to 8.2%; Update: New Romney ad attacks on jobs, Solyndra Ed Morrissey 3 hours ago
- Obamateurism of the Day Ed Morrissey 3 hours ago











Exploiting Public Ignorance
Actually educated people know that during the Reagan Years, Reagan proposed 4% increases in spending, Liberals in Congress proposed 13% increases in spending.
In fact, if congress would have listened to Reagan, the federal budget would have balanced by 1988.
Not bad considering he came into office with double digit unemployment, double digit inflation, and double digit interests rates.