In response to:

Graham: No Confirmations For Hagel or Brennan Without More Information on Benghazi Attack

badgerpat Wrote: Feb 11, 2013 10:48 AM
Lois, having corrupt incompetent leaders is far more hazardous to American soldiers and our intelligence operations than having no leaders. Also, identifying why our government left those four Americans to die, whether it was incompetence or malice, and dealing with that issue, will make our servicemen and intelligence operators much safer in the future. I'd say "nice try Lois," but it wasn't.
badgerpat Wrote: Feb 11, 2013 11:42 AM
Lois, Try to stay on task. We are talking about Benghazi, and getting answers. Stop trying to change the subject when you are losing the argument. Please review the chain of posts here and try to refresh your mind as to what we are talking about, then re-engage in the discussion. That's how this is supposed to work.
scrow Wrote: Feb 11, 2013 11:02 AM
And the Democrats blocked some of Bush's nominations.

And the GOP blocked some of Clinton's nominations.

And the Democrats blocked some of Reagan's and Bush 41's nominations.

You do know how the concept of "opposition party" works, right?
BabyChe'sCrushedSkull Wrote: Feb 11, 2013 11:00 AM
Just like they blocked Kerry's nomination? Retard.
Loiso12013 Wrote: Feb 11, 2013 10:53 AM
The GOP has been blocking nominations since Obama's first day in office. Benghazi does not seem like the reason.

Appearing on CBS Face the Nation Sunday morning, Republican Senator Lindsey Graham said he will ask his colleagues to hold off on the confirmation of John Brennan for CIA Director and Chuck Hagel for Defense Secretary until the White House coughs up more information about the 9/11 terror attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi.

“I don’t think we should allow Brennan to go forward for the CIA directorship, Hagel to be confirmed to secretary of defense, until the White House gives us an accounting,” Graham said on Face the Nation. “Did the president ever pick up...