In response to:

Why Non-Torture is More Honorable Than Assassination

Baby Karl Wrote: Feb 10, 2013 6:08 AM
But turning them into Vapor isn't a problem? And btw dummy... We already waterboard our own boys... Didn't you read the column?
Bigdogoffthechain11 Wrote: Feb 10, 2013 10:56 PM
Moral and legal obligations apply to us. Doesn't matter who we are facing..the laws still apply to us. So you look supremely stupid now, don't ya? Yes, you do.
t252 Wrote: Feb 10, 2013 9:41 PM
I don't need to call you names, your stupidity does it for me. Moral and legal obligations apply to enemy combatants who were a uniform and fight for a country. Not to terrorists.
Bigdogoffthechain11 Wrote: Feb 10, 2013 8:28 PM
Easy p h uckstick-targeting enemy combatants is an act of war and is completely legal and moral. Once you capture a detainee, you have a moral and legal obligation to treat them humanely. I know this is a lot for your little p h uckstick brain-so pay attention-shooting a rabid dog is different from torturing one to death. Moron.
Baby Karl Wrote: Feb 10, 2013 4:05 PM
Hey numb-nuts for brains... How us killing someone more moral than water boarding them?
Bigdogoffthechain11 Wrote: Feb 10, 2013 10:38 AM
Targeting enemy combatants is perfectly fine-torturing is not.

Don't you get it, dummy?

Astoundingly we have seen the media turn into hypocrites in recent days.

Shock of shocks... how can it be?

But when the President that an overwhelming majority of media members voted for, was running for President, they parroted his message of compassion, and American humility, and the need for us to talk to our enemies instead of torturing them.

Being in the solid minority of media members who held that we either kill the guys who are trying to kill us, or at the very least, extract information about when they are next going to try to kill us, I...