In response to:

Sen. Paul: C'mon, Obama's Gay-Marriage Views Coudn't Have Gotten 'Any Gayer'

b_niles57 Wrote: May 14, 2012 9:45 AM
That's the LEAST rational reason I've ever heard. You are talking about a parable about two cities that may have existed, and may have been destroyed for a variety of reasons, one of which may have been excessive sodomy by it's population. Maybe. Yo may have rational reasons, but worrying about S& G dosen't count as rational.

With Team Obama constantly pulling rhetorical sleights-of-hand with the mainstream media, especially with Obama's ostensibly "evolved" ideas (a.k.a, quadruple flip-flopped political interests) on gay marriage this past week, I find it moderately refreshing that there are still federal politicians capable of a little straight-shootin' real talk. At a dinner in Iowa last night, Sen. Rand Paul yet again demonstrated his aptitude for cutting through the blather and offered up his succinct take on the political realm's recent gay-marriage themed events:

GOP Sen. Rand Paul (Ky.) on Saturday blasted President Obama's decision to endorse same-sex marriage, mocking...