In response to:

Republicans Have Bad Brains?

b_niles57 Wrote: May 03, 2012 3:14 PM
Please explain - abnormally low? It's unclear what you are referring to.
b_niles57 Wrote: May 03, 2012 3:29 PM
I guess I'm asking for your source that we are low CO2/Temp
Solipslip Wrote: May 03, 2012 3:25 PM
I submit that you are unaware, not due to some mental deficiency, but due to the limited and directed information propagated upon our citizenry.

Again I ask, what are the time periods being compared in the current literature. I have, in the course of reading the most abundant literature seen as low a 100 years and maybe as long as few 100 thousand, rare do you see millions.

b_niles57 Wrote: May 03, 2012 3:19 PM
No. What data are you referring to. It is not my understanding that what you say is true, and I would like to be enlightened. I'm unaware of this claim
Solipslip Wrote: May 03, 2012 3:17 PM
as in low CO2 levels and low temperatures,better?

"They do that because they were born that way."

If you say that about homosexuals, you are tolerant and realistic. If you say it about blacks, you are racist (unless you're black yourself). If you say it about women, you may or may not be sexist, depending on who is manning (er, womanning) the feminist battle stations. If you say it about men, you just might be a writer for Esquire. But if you say it about conservatives, you're a scientist.

Over the past decade, a new fad has taken hold among academics and liberal journalists: call it the new science...

Sunday, May 19 | 06:16 PM ET
Sunday, May 19 | 06:16 PM ET
Sunday, May 19 | 06:16 PM ET
Sunday, May 19 | 06:16 PM ET