In response to:

10 Facts for Liberals: Why Gun Control Can't Stop Another Newtown Massacre

AWLkabong Wrote: Dec 22, 2012 9:21 PM
In the 'run-up' to the '94 Clinton Ban On 'Deadly Assault Weapons', I was working mucho overtime. I had never owned that type of rifle and had zero interest in them prior. I was satisfied that as an American, I was free to own one if I so chose. That sleazeball Arkansas lawyer made tens of millions of AR-15 fans. The hobby has grown in leaps and bounds. The NRA should have a 15 foot statue of Clinton in their lobby. BTW in the 20 years I have had these guns, I have threatened No One with them. Although I did make a solemn promise to a guy with my Bushmaster Shorty a couple of nights after Hurricane Katrina. I had run him off and confiscated his bicycle the night before. He was wearing a very expensive Euro pistol in a shoulder ho

There are now calls from the Left for gun control legislation in response to Adam Lanza's unconscionable mass killing of innocent children at Sandy Hook Elementary. However, very few people seem to be asking the most basic question of all before getting started: What gun control legislation could have stopped Adam Lanza?

The answer is "none."

Let's consider a few alternatives:

1) The school was already a "gun free zone;" so obviously that wasn't effective. Of course, the sort of people who would respect a "gun free zone" in the first place are the very ones you wouldn't have to worry...