In response to:

Guns and Piers Morgan

AWLblack_powder Wrote: Jan 03, 2013 5:52 AM
No It Isn't It's Destroying your enemy. Driving him before you and hearing the lament of his women.
Luscious Lars Wrote: Jan 03, 2013 9:38 AM
But the protection of "Free Speech" is a protection against government infringement. Just like the protections of the right to keep and bear arms is against government infringement. If my CEO says "no guns shall be allowed in our facilities", he is not in violation of the 2nd Amendment. However, if Dianne FineSwine passes a law saying, "You cannot own an AR15", she is in violation of the 2nd Amendment. Think a little deeper, there, mross480. You can overcome the bad education you received in our public indoctrination institutions, otherwise known as "public schools".
mross480 Wrote: Jan 03, 2013 9:34 AM
Who is the 'enemy'? Anyone who tries to destroy freedom of speech could be considered an enemy of the U.S. Constitution.
Earl29 Wrote: Jan 03, 2013 7:21 AM

CNN's Piers Morgan writes that the pro-gun crowd's anger toward him stems from anti-British bias: "This gun debate is an ongoing war of verbal attrition in America -- and I'm just the latest target, the advantage to the gun lobbyists being that I'm British, a breed of human being who burned down the White House in 1814 and had to be forcefully deported en masse, as no American will ever be allowed to forget."

Scads of "in-sourced" Brits appear on our telly without us Yanks calling for their deportation. Hell, we just let a Brit play Abe Lincoln. Fox's...