In response to:

The Need for Semi-Automatic "Assault" Weapons

AuntAllisonWillBeThere Wrote: Jan 10, 2013 10:55 AM
Remember these are the people who said Obamacare was communism and if it passed we would be trotted before death panels
Doubtful Avenger Wrote: Jan 10, 2013 11:28 AM
And, as we are seeing, that was absolutely correct. Most of the worst part of the law hasn't even been implemented, and we can't afford it. So, to cut costs, the government will resort to the language in the law that authorizes decisions about who gets medical care and who doesn't. I trust you have a plan for when you are denied medical care?
byeBarry Wrote: Jan 10, 2013 11:03 AM
It hasn't been implemented yet genus!

By now, we’ve heard the argument about semi-automatic "assault" rifles: nobody needs one. We’ve heard the only reason why someone would obtain this kind of weapon is so they can kill people, which is far from the truth. We’ve also heard the argument from both the Left and the Right that a pistol is how someone protects their home.

"I really don’t know why people need assault weapons. I’m not a hunter but I understand people who want to hunt," Republican Rep. Peter King said on Morning Joe earlier this week. "I understand people who live in rough neighborhoods...