In response to:

Sandra Fluke: Opposing the Contraception Mandate Is Just Like Opposing Leukemia Coverage

Arugula76 Wrote: Feb 02, 2013 2:34 AM
yes indeed the boy was brave. He made his choice on religious grounds for himself. And now employers can make the choice not to cover such treatment on behalf of their employees as well if they deem blood transfusions to be immoral. So yes, you'll still be able to get treatment, just as you will be able to get baby blockers, just not with your employer provided heath insurance.

On MSNBC this afternoon, Sandra Fluke truly outdid herself, attempting to argue that the people who disagree with the contraception mandate on religious freedom grounds are in the same category as people who oppose insurance coverage for leukemia.

What's important to note is that some of the folks who are continuing to object to this policy are actually worried about employers who are private companies, not religiously affiliated employers in any way, but the boss has a particular religious concern, and they want to be able to deny...