>Is it a "military necessity" to be able to tell homosexual soldiers they're going to Hell? No, but it should also be in a chaplains choice whether he wants to cousel a servicemembersor if he wants to "marry" gay servicemembers(which is coming down the pike) and the natural extension would be to marriage consel gay couples. Chaplains should not have to perform any services that go AGAINST their religious beliefs! And yes, it is imposing homosexual behavior on the military. Is there co-ed showers? Are there co-ed combat units? Nope, but now we have to deal with "sexuality" on the line, because sexuality has been thrown in there. Military doesn't just tolerate something-they embrace it.

And furthermore you use the term "social engineering" Who the hell on the Christian right is social engineering? They are trying to stop the social engineers...

By "Bible thumping" and "pushing your own personal agenda" I assume you mean that evangelical Christians are trying somehow to change something... Who pushes the CHANGE of DADT? Who pushes the CHANGE of same-sex marriage? Nobody is bible thumping, we are responding to A PERSONAL AGENDA who is trying to POLITICALLY CHANGE the country. Get it? I am frickin not even Christian and I am against gay marriage for FISCAL reasons, and the fact that gay marriage is BIG Government.. Oye! Wish people would think logically and get out of the sheeple talking points...

More girls are aborted in India due to the payment of dowrys...and in the end it doesn't matter. Abortion that was instituted to "free" women have victimized them more than it has freed them. It has allowed these archaic policies to go on.

I love women like you.. You probably don't hesitate to remark that it "takes two to make a baby" when we are talking about child support, but when when we are talking about the life of the baby then the father is expendable. Enough with the line that "women are victims..." MMKAY... women are victims until they stand up for themselves. Those were women who aborted those girls... Who else will stand up for others of our sex if not OUR MOTHERS?

Actually the Constitution guarantees equal protection, and the Supreme Court has put three levels of equal protection out there. Race being the top tier. Gender being middle and homosexuality being the lowest.

And yet the same Supreme Court that legalized Loving v. Virginia looked at Same sex marriage and decided it wasn't a Constitutional right in Baker v. Nelson. They decided that states had a factor in deciding who could and couldn't marry. Loving v. Virginia was discriminatory... It said whites could not intermarry other races while other races could. Marriage is not currently defined by sexual preference and most states NO ONE can marry same sex for any reason therefore there is no discrimination. Homosexuals have the same opportunity to get married. Contrary to what people like you believe... the state could care less about "love."

It is not "homo' talk. It is about people who have no basic manners or decency. Their homosexuality status does not allow them to be repugnant pigs towards people they do not agree with. Homo or not -what Dan Savage said was disgusting and vile.

>But in America Divorce rates hit close to 50% Bogus percentage...They take new marriages in the year and then take divorces. Marriages that are long standing aren't ever added into the percentage..

>Coming out as a one woman loving woman was actually easy. My friend and I both discussed the merits of being a lesbian once. It was the time my husband had to shovel her husband out of the snow, because he decided to take the vehicle off roading.. We decided that woman are smart enough not to leave a perfectly good road to go off roading....and that if we were involved with one; we would have never got the call. Then there is the whole noticing when you change your hair thing.. ;)