In response to:

The Republican Rape Dilemma

ardee2x Wrote: Oct 26, 2012 3:37 PM
My concern is neither legal or political but the casualness of which we treat or own lives and the lives of others. The animus is equal on both sides and there seems to be no middle ground perhaps because those are the wrong forums to discuss the matter. Statistics are trends not truths, "one size fits all" laws, don't and rights are all too often subject to interpretation, circumstances and whims.
Anominus Wrote: Oct 26, 2012 4:12 PM
When the difference is life or death, there can be no middle ground.

As Richard Mourdock’s Indiana Senate fate hinges on how voters absorb his views on rape, all conservatives have an opportunity for a look in the mirror.

Just how pro-life do we want to be?

The Mourdock controversy is nothing like Todd Akin’s self-inflicted wound in Missouri, the result of an embrace of just plain bad medical information.

Mourdock is in hot water for accurately (if not particularly skillfully) articulating what God instructs about the life of the unborn.

If he is on politically shaky ground, it is because he had the courage to stand on the...