In response to:

Why Did I Know More About Benghazi Than the National Media?

Archer77 Wrote: May 11, 2013 3:08 PM
There was a financial surprise in 2008. Obama had worked for acorn, which made banks make bad loans; the whole program pushed by the dems. All of this bad paper was sold by wall-street ( again, mostly dems. ) to the world financial markets which eventually ( in a few years ) caused the panic in 2008. Bush was president and repubs got the blame.
Archer77 Wrote: May 12, 2013 1:33 PM
If a dem. was president in 2008, the powers that be would have delayed the financial disaster a few mos. until after the election to not negatively impact their candidate. The media would of done what ever they were told.
Drifter33 Wrote: May 11, 2013 5:00 PM
If only Mitt Romney had had even a little fire in the belly to go after Obama on Benghazi with relentless constancy, every day, and in every debate...we might be saying "ex-president Obama" right now.

All of this week's "revelations" were known back then--and they stunk just as bad then as they do now. Our president was AWOL during an international crisis in which HIS ambassador was murdered, along with 3 other citizens.

We've heard from the DCM and others, which is a start. Now, let's hear from other "players" in this event: Leon Panetta; David Petraeus; GEN Dempsey (if anybody can rouse him from his slumber); GEN(Ret) Carter Ham, then AFRICOM commander; and LTC Gibson of the USASF, who was in Tripoli and ready to board a plane to Benghazi when "somebody" stood him down.

WHO made that decision? Where was the president?