1 - 3
If this debate is truly about women having easy and "free" access to birth control, then why does the WH and the progressives feel the need to force insurance companies to provide the freebies when Planned Parenthood and alot of county health clinics across the country already do so? The HHS ruling makes no sense before or after the "compromise". If abortions performed by Planned Parenthood are wrong, the perfect way to correct the wrong is to provide birth control. Women who follow the religious dogma against birth control will not care that their insurance provides the contraceptives. Women who follow their own hearts on the matter will not either. They are already getting the contraceptives. The HHS ruling is moot on that issue.
In response to:

The fickle finger of fairness?

archeng59 Wrote: Jan 30, 2012 8:57 AM
Do you think Obama's changes are for the overall good or not? I believe not. His supporters claim he saved the economy with his bailouts and stimulus packages. What economy did he save? Unemployment is not better. My business is just skating along and is nothing like it was before 2008. I cannot hire people because there is only enough business to cover my expenses. If not for savings stashed away prior to 2008, I would not have any employees now. Obama and the Democrats have not helped from my point of view. Their new America is not for me.
In response to:

The fickle finger of fairness?

archeng59 Wrote: Jan 30, 2012 8:09 AM
Obama is for wealth redistribution and income equality so how does he increase taxes on the wealthy and not have a plan for giving handouts to the lower income people so everyone is equal? He has no plan to use the increased revenue to reduce the deficit. He will increase spending on social programs, which is the same as handouts.
1 - 3