1 - 10 Next
the Judge ordered that this naughty little boy has to return to New Jersey and live in his mother's basement again.

Aw-w-w-w-w-w-w!
Your first sentence was

"that is an obviously hostile assessment from a flaming liberal source. "

Don't you see how that one sentence was predictable from the original research?
"Conservatives condemn the action -"

Let's count here.

How many conservative posts do YOU see "condemning" the actions of this twit?
The last time I saw grown men wearing ruffles and tight breeches was in the Chicago Gay Pride parade.

Now I get the Tea Party appeal, it took a while but it's clear.
Maybe some of the "enhanced interrogation" guys like him are so fond of will work to get the full story in his case.
Have you ever noticed that when cons are caught at something they always deflect the facts by drumming up every sin ever committed by a Dem (liberal, gay, woman, person of color, college professor, etc.)
You really think that Palin's e-mail and Landrieu's phones involve the same kind of security threat?

Landrieu happens to be chair Chair of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee you moron. Sarah Palin is a celebu-pol.
Hacking the phones of Homeland Security officers is just a tad more serious, no?

Maybe that person you hired to do your reading for you will also explain the simple facts to you.
In response to:

Honor for a Terrorist Draws No Objection

Arcee Wrote: Mar 27, 2010 10:24 PM
That we are not supposed to criticize or question any decision that a sovereign nation carries out because it feels it to be in its own best interests.

Let's see, there was the ethnic cleansing in Bosnia, genocide in Rwanda, the refusal to accept aid that would have saved thousands of lives in "Burma", there was Pinochet, Hussein, and the Trail of Tears. (oops!)

And, were these countries and leaders to have announced their decisions and policies as a finger in the eye to visiting Americans, we would celebrate it, I'm sure.
Four researchers who culled through 50 years of research literature about the psychology of conservatism report that at the core of political conservatism is the resistance to change and a tolerance for inequality, and that some of the common psychological factors linked to political conservatism include:

* Fear and aggression
* Dogmatism and intolerance of ambiguity
* Uncertainty avoidance
* Need for cognitive closure
* Terror management

"From our perspective, these psychological factors are capable of contributing to the adoption of conservative ideological contents, either independently or in combination," the researchers wrote in an article, "Political Conservatism as Motivated Social...
about the landrieu/wing-nerd case is that conservatives are so unable to discuss any embarrassment to their own without trying deflect the point onto Democrats. Trying to illegaly enter the offices of a top homeland security official is OK because John Edwards had an affair, or something.

The compulsion to respond to any act by a conservative by referencing an act by a progressive is a sort of form of ideological Tourette's syndrome.
1 - 10 Next
Friday, June 01 | 07:12 PM ET
Friday, June 01 | 07:12 PM ET
Friday, June 01 | 07:12 PM ET
Friday, June 01 | 07:12 PM ET