In response to:

Obama’s Energy Plans: Tragedy Disguised as Triumph

Arc-em Wrote: Feb 18, 2013 6:03 AM
Sorry Marita, your article makes waaaaaaay too much sense for for the social engineers in Washington. It is also too simple, low cost abundant energy just can't happen can it?
Marita Wrote: Feb 19, 2013 9:19 AM
Well, thanks for the affirmation. I received an email from a reader calling me an idiot and accusing me of being jealous of Obama's greatness.

The State of the Union Address (SOTUA) is now last week’s history. Nearly every aspect of it has been fully dissected. For example, the National Taxpayers Union (NTU) has done a line-by-line analysis of what they call the “most expensive and widest ranging State of the Union Address yet.” They found that the “quantifiable agenda items” in the President’s proposals “weighed in at $83.4 billion.” The NTU called the efforts to combat climate change the “most costly single agenda item”—citing a “version of the ‘cap-and-trade’ bill to which Obama referred in his speech was priced at $282.4 billion...