In response to:

The Surprising Gift of 'Zero Dark Thirty'

AppraisHer Wrote: Jan 19, 2013 10:06 PM
Liberals condemn enhanced interrogation unless the information needed will save their life or the life of a family member. Then waterboarding wouldn't be be enough. They also condemn guns unless their or a family members life is at stake, then any good guy with a gun is a Godsend. Can you spell H Y P O C R I T E?
JustMC Wrote: Jan 19, 2013 11:52 PM
Sadly, our foreign policy is not the behavior of good guys. We betray the brave men and women who surrendered their sovereignty over their lives and bodies to protect this country, and use them to line the pockets of the rich here and their murderous dictator cronies abroad. It is a shameful betrayal of the American soldier, the most egregious bailout of private investment with not only public money, but the blood of the bravest Americans.

And despite their rhetoric, most of the Democrats are complicit in this just like most of the Republicans.
Texas Chris Wrote: Jan 21, 2013 9:19 AM
I agree. Our government (I refuse to say "we") has been poking dogs with military sticks for generations, and one of those dogs bit (again). THAT is why our government is in a position where pundits must to use twisted logic to justify morally questionable "enhanced interrogation" techniques...

When it comes to Kathryn Bigelow’s “Zero Dark Thirty,” there are two kinds of people-- those who have seen it and those who should.

Emerging from any theater afterward, there will be two kinds of people-- those who grasp that enhanced interrogations save lives, and those who do not.

As a longtime member of the first group, I was gratified to the point of surprise that a product out of Hollywood depicted our harshest interrogations without an accompanying ham-fisted condemnation.

But the even greater praise for “Zero Dark Thirty” is that nor does it grab you by the lapels and...

Sunday, May 19 | 11:32 AM ET
Sunday, May 19 | 11:32 AM ET
Sunday, May 19 | 11:32 AM ET
Sunday, May 19 | 11:32 AM ET