In response to:

Seeing Moral Grays in 9/11

ApolloSpeaks18 Wrote: Nov 18, 2009 7:51 AM
What did the imbecile Chris Matthew's say? That "bin Ladin isn't an evil man; that he just has a different point of view." Many on the left hold that 9/11 wasn't an act of pure, absolute, unmitigated evil; that there was some moral justification for it: US support of Israel; US troops stationed in the Middle East. For the Left there is a right and wrong side to 9/11; and they are hoping that the trial of KSM will bring clarity to both.

Picking up the Sunday paper Nov. 15 could make a reader a little airsick -- even while standing in the driveway. The Washington Post "news analysis" on the front page carried the headline "9/11 trial could become a parable of right and wrong: Before worldwide audience, both prosecution, defense seek control of narrative."

Does The Washington Post really think that the death and destruction of 9/11 "could" be right, or "could" be wrong?

Arguing with Idiots By Glenn Beck

Liberals cannot stand it when the national media won't simply declare contentious debates over and their viewpoint...

Related Tags: Media and Culture MSNBC 9/11