In response to:

Tax Damaging Choices, Not Beneficial Behavior

Apollo2 Wrote: Jul 14, 2010 4:30 PM
No Medved, the government should not be involved in taxing anyone's choices. You may have left the Democratic party but you never stopped being a liberal busybody who has the uncontrollable need to control other people's lives. If Darwin and the free market consequences of stupid behavior aren't enough to dissuade fools from harming themselves then government force, and taxation is force, will not remedy the situation. Every time the government regulates individual choices there are always huge unintended consequences. Drug use is discouraged in the extreme by fines and imprisonment. Not only has drug use not been eliminated but tens of thousands of people have died in gang wars over drug turf. High cigarette taxes have provided...

With government at every level desperately seeking more revenue to cope with soaring deficits, citizens should evaluate all tax proposals according to two crucial principles: It's better to tax choices than necessities, and bad choices deserve taxation more than good choices. For one thing, these distinctions will help resolve raging debates over efforts to impose new costs on sugary soda, bottled water, candy, tanning salons and other indulgences.

Of course, tea party supporters and other conservatives are right to resist all governmental attempts to spend more money, and to make the point that local, state and federal governments shouldn't get the...

Friday, June 01 | 04:32 AM ET
Friday, June 01 | 04:32 AM ET
Friday, June 01 | 04:32 AM ET
Friday, June 01 | 04:32 AM ET