In response to:

NY Times Reporter Accuses Bush of 'Negligence' Regarding 9/11

Antnys Wrote: Sep 11, 2012 9:26 PM
Typical NYT hogwash. The 9/11 hijackers were already here busily learning how to fly planes (in a USA presided over by Bill Clinton) long before the 2000 election even began to heat up. Democrats were too busy campaigning for planet earth and Al Gore, and helping him try to sue his way into the White House to pay much attention to national security. Bill Clinton was too preoccupied giving serial adultery tips to Gore's running mate, John Edwards, and negotiating the enormous bribe required for him to pardon the FBI's then-most-wanted fugitive, Mark Rich. Finally, Hillary was too buys plotting the theft of White House furniture and china (and a senate seat from New York) to focus on Osama bin Laden.

On this solemn day, most of the nation mourns the loss of life that occurred on this day eleven years ago and contemplates the changes that have occurred since then. Most, but not all. Kurt Eichenwald, contributing editor for Vanity Fair and writer for the New York Times, published an inflammatory op-ed accusing former President Bush of not preventing the attacks:

“While those documents are still not public, I have read excerpts from many of them, along with other recently declassified records, and come to an inescapable conclusion: the administration’s reaction to what Mr. Bush was told in the weeks...
Sunday, May 26 | 01:26 AM ET
Sunday, May 26 | 01:26 AM ET
Sunday, May 26 | 01:26 AM ET
Sunday, May 26 | 01:26 AM ET