oh, more name calling. i don't think i'm on the same mission as you. encouraging the big government statist republican party to keep promoting a new democrat-lite RINO candidate every 4 years in not a mission i choose to participate in. my mission is to stand firmly for constitutional limited government and liberty principles, and to support only those candidates who are loyal to their oath of office to obey the constitution. maybe that's a foreign concept to you.

well said , earl. so much for mr. electable.

michael supports the trendy establishment promoted candidate, and then calls the supporters of the candidate who is all about sovereignty and individualism "bots". rombot michael sure is ridiculous !!

or you can say the rombots are to blame for not supporting ron paul, the ONLY candidate who was not obama-lite. are people like you going to continue forever to insist that constitutionalists vote for your lesser of two evils ( or lesser of 2 socialists ) RINO candidates, and never vote our principles ????

or you can say the rombots are to blame for not supporting ron paul, the ONLY candidate who was not obama-lite. are people like you going to continue forever to insist that constitutionalists vote for your lesser of two evils ( or lesser of 2 socialists ) RINO candidates, and never vote our principles ????

chameleon rommey's choice for VP is a man who has a track record of supporting amost every bailout. romney himself said that he thinks ben bernanke is doing a good job. despite the chameleon's experience in the business world, i see no specific reason's to trust him to do the right thing for the economy.

when you are deep in debt, obviously you MUST cut spending. romney proposed ZERO actually cuts in spending, which is not surprising for someone who loves big government. ( only small decreases in projected increases) if romney was really serious about avoiding the fiscal cliff, he should have at least supported ron paul's very specific plan to cut $1 TRILLION in the first year and eliminate those unconstitutional department, agencies, and beaurocracies. of course he didn't.

chameleon romney is NOT a conservative, and has never had anything to do with any "conservative movement". i can't imagine why ANYONE would want him to run again.

henry, who did you support? did your candidate have a better plan the cutting federal spending by $1 TRILLION in the first year. abolishishing 5 federal departments, ending foreign aid, and cutting the spending of many more agencies like the EPA in half. please tell me about YOUR candidate's superior plan.

ron paul received far more donations from members of the military than all other candidates combined. the biggest source of romney's financial support was wall street. it was hard for ron paul to compete when the party establishment and the media goes out of their way to marginalize and ridicule him. basically, it is a difficult mountain to climb when you are a genuine constitutional conservative running for the nomination of a liberal big government party.