In response to:

5 Things That Will Be Different If Mitt Romney Defeats Barack Obama

anti-neocon Wrote: Aug 10, 2012 2:53 PM
this reads more like a wish list than fact: may be this..., likely that.. we still have heard no specifics from mittens because he is without principles and stands for nothing. never did. never will.
RayTheAnarchoCapitalist Wrote: Aug 10, 2012 9:00 PM
He stands for going wherever the political winds push him.
renny4 Wrote: Aug 10, 2012 5:57 PM
You sound like someone who was let out without taking his.her,its meds.
anti-neocon Wrote: Aug 10, 2012 6:23 PM
you sound like you don't have anything intelligent to say, so you repeat something stupid that you read online before, that you think will make you sound clever. prove anything i have said to be wrong, and then i will take you seriously.
Kim D Wrote: Aug 10, 2012 8:51 PM
Anti-everything,

There is no proving or disproving an opinon. When someone is as close minded as you though, their opinions tend to be no opinion at all. All that ever comes from a closed mind like yours is rejection of everyone else's ideas.

Far too much of the campaign season so far has revolved around trivia. That's largely Barack Obama's fault. Obama wants to see more of Mitt's tax returns. Who cares? Obama's rich, but Mitt's really rich; so we should hate him because he has more money than we do -- or something. After Mitt left Bain, some company went bust, some random guy lost his health care and later got it back, but it wasn't as good as it was at Bain; so Mitt killed his wife somehow or another? On the other hand, while Mitt's campaign has at least...