1 - 10 Next
I believe the media's continuing failure to accurately report on the Ron Paul Campaign makes his supports feel the need to get the messege out there loudly. Sometimes this can lead to bad behavior. I have never seen it myself at the Ron Paul rallies but I know it happens just the same as with any people group. Bad behavior can be found in every campaign. When I was at the Colorado state GOP convention, for example, it was some in the Romney camp who played dirty. They formed a 'fake' Ron Paul slate of delegates and distributed them all over the stadium. It turns out the 'fake' slate had all the same delegates as the Romney slate. They tried to fool honest voting citizens into voting for Romney's delegates. Not the only state it happened.
What the f*%# are tiy talking about?
In response to:

Romney Needs Spending Cutters

Anonymous908 Wrote: May 14, 2012 9:55 PM
There is nobody in all of Congress that is better on the issue of cutting spending than Ron Paul. Mitt Romney' budget proposal just about keeps the budget where it already is. Romney is for cutting spending (of course this only applies to proposed increases in spending). There is not much spending that is already going on now that Romney talks about cutting. Romney and Obama alike are not wha our budget needs and not what our economy needs.
In response to:

Romney Needs Spending Cutters

Anonymous908 Wrote: May 14, 2012 9:51 PM
Yeah, because the people on TOWNHALL are stupid enough to listen to simple minded, unfounded, name calling. You fell for the the liberal media's attack scheme against Ron Paul. They found somebody they could not dig up dirt on so they played they race card.
Is the race over? no Have we gone to the National Convention yet? no Do we even know the exact number of delegates each candidate has? NOOOO Quit acting like it is all over. Ron Paul is still very much in the race. Just because TH and your television channels pretend that it is all over doesn't make it over. We still have primaries to go - including Texas and California which are HUGE.
Been there long enough. Spent enough money there. Lost enough troops there. Time to come home. We got Osama. What are we waiting for now? For all who don't like our presence there to suddenly lay down their guns and welcome us? No. We should have left years ago. We are just saving face now. Ron Paul knew this years ago. Just for the record he also claimed on the House floor circa 2005 that Bin Ladin was probably in Pakistan, not Afganistan. Just think of how many lives we could have spared and how much money we could have saved if we listened to him.
I am 26 years old now. The Paul Ryan plan balances the budget in 30 years. That would make me 56 years old when we balance it. And this is our "conservative alternative" to Obama. Are you kidding me? There is nothing conservative about the Paul Ryan plan. The idea that Romney is going to get our economy back in shape and government spending under control is a joke. He will do no such thing. Talking points are not the same thing as actual positions on issues. Romney would add to our debt, just not as fast as Obama would. We need to wake up and support a candidate who actually stands on fiscal responsibility. Ron Paul is the only one who does this. Just to add to the
What! Base our vote on the candidate's record?! Are you implying that the best way to judge a candidate and predict his future behavior is by looking at their past? So for example if we want lower taxes we should vote for somebody who has never raised taxes? With that kind of logic we would all be voting for somebody like Ron Paul.
Yes, lets all pretend the race is over. Pay no attention to his rival candidates still accumulating delegates. Lets all get behind our savior from Obama, Mitt Romney. He'll stand for conservative family values! Oh wait... He'll bring fiscal sanity back to Washington! Oh wait... He'll stand consistent and not bend for special interests! Oh wait.... Pull your fingers out of your ears and look for the facts, not talking points. The race is still on.
In response to:

The GOP: A Party in Flux

Anonymous908 Wrote: Apr 18, 2012 2:24 PM
No it is not down to 2 choices. Ron Paul is still very much in the game. Of course if you just watch TV or look at the status quo's version of the delegates you wouldn't know this. Those numbers are nothing but a guess (unbound delegates) scewed in favor of the establishment candidates. The fact is we are going to go backrupt as a nation unless Ron Paul is elected president PERIOD. If anybody disagrees with me show me the facts. Show me exactly what Romney would do to shrink real spending that is already taking place. Instead what you will find he only talks about cuts to proposed increases in spending. Yes, Romney is obviously better than Obama. I'm not denying that. But we would go broke with either of them. We need BOLD BOLD cuts.
1 - 10 Next
Friday, June 01 | 06:47 PM ET
Friday, June 01 | 06:47 PM ET
Friday, June 01 | 06:47 PM ET
Friday, June 01 | 06:47 PM ET