1 - 4
In response to:

What's Rule of Law?

Anonymous6925 Wrote: Dec 18, 2014 7:50 PM
Fukuyama defines it as when the rulers see themselves as below existent laws, customs, traditions...much like European nobles & kings felt themselves to be below the established 'laws' of the Church and bound to behave at least in cognizance of them...and unlike the Red Chinee government, which recognizes nothing above the Communist Party...also unlike arrogant liberals who get out of bed knowing everything (all heart and all brains, too!) who are superior by dint of whim.
In response to:

America's Next President

Anonymous6925 Wrote: Dec 18, 2014 2:02 PM
Yabba yabba paba-baba Americans knew, Clinton was buoyed, It is known...whoever wrote this piece of cheese can uncut it right now. Hey look! I can pile up words, too! How many is that so far?
Loney, Eric is doing the liberal slide, deceptively shifting the focus to something else. In this case, he's in high dudgeon over the ACTIVIST additive. I'd let him bray at the moon.
I realize - as many do not - that minorities, radicals, etc, are in on it, and know he's lying, and squirm in their efforts to not appear so, and hope he gets away with it. All anti-white, anti-American and anti-free enterprise will not be enlightened. But union thu--, er, excuse me, leaders ought to be more rational. Hey! It's the PIED PIPER PRESIDENT!
1 - 4