In response to:

When I Want a Progressive’s Opinion on What Guns I Should Have/Hunt with, I’ll Give it to Them

Anonymous6702 Wrote: Jan 20, 2013 10:57 AM
Bravo!! The best article in here in a while. And in my opinion, assault rifles and like are precisely what the second amendment would protect more than any other gun type, in this day and age. The reason being that defense against tyranny is the biggest reason the founders created the 2nd amendment. The object of the amendment was to deter a tyrant from taking over in the first place, not so much to regain control after one took over. Secondarily it would be for an after the fact scenario to retake the government. But hordes of people armed with grandpa's old 10 gauge goose gun style weapon or even your dad's 30.30 deer rifle would hardy intimidate a would-be dictator. Jefferson also wrote of basic self-defense from crime as a reason.
My buddy, Green Beret badass Bryan Sikes, shot a massive whitetail buck last week during our South Texas Purple Heart Adventure. He whacked said muy grande with a LaRue Tactical OBR chambered for the glorious .308 Win. round. Oh and BTW, Sikes used a high capacity magazine during this hunt.

For those of you who aren’t hip to the LaRue, it is a weapon that progressive darlings say we should not have because we don’t “need” such a weapon for hunting.

Hunting, according to these wizards of odd, is what they think our founding fathers had in mind when...

Related Tags: Guns Hunting Hunting Rights