1 - 5
In response to:

Two Encouraging Facts

anonymous6292 Wrote: Nov 03, 2012 3:57 AM
You don't really back up your points with facts. His tax plan does add up if you go read it. If it doesn't then actually say where he is lying.
In response to:

Two Encouraging Facts

anonymous6292 Wrote: Nov 03, 2012 3:57 AM
You don't really back up your points with facts. His tax plan does add up if you go read it. If it doesn't then actually say where he is lying.
In response to:

Flooded by Keynesianism

anonymous6292 Wrote: Nov 03, 2012 3:51 AM
There is no difference in rebuilding a thousand houses that were destroyed versus a thousand houses that will never be used. Both are an equivalent waste.
So should I be able to speak (run an ad) regardless of the ability to pay? Should I be able to keep and bear arms and the govt. should furnish me with the weapon? You get the point.
In response to:

Beat GSA!

anonymous6292 Wrote: Aug 04, 2012 2:43 AM
To be fair, the high costs of these fuels are due to their experimental nature. If this was a legitimate scientific experiment, then it's possibly money well spent (more or less). If there was nothing to learn from this then it's certainly a waste.
1 - 5