1 - 10 Next
Ayers follows the usual mold of the communists. As a matter of fact there's not a dimes worth of difference between Stalin and Adolf Hitler. A slightly different party name, but at the beginning of WWII Stalin and Hitler had signed an agreement of fealty and accord. That only fell apart when Hitler attacked Russia with operation Barbarossa. The word Fascist came into style after that attack and Russia immediately decided to align with Britain and America out of self defense and later on took the opportunity to gain as much land in Europe and also all the Japanese holding they could grab as well with little cost to themselves. On the other hand I recommend the stories of the signers of the Declaration of Independence written by Paul Harvey and Rush Limbaugh's father with expands Paul Harvey's article a bit. About the only signers of that document that weren't college graduates were Benjamin Franklin and George Washington. At the end of the Declaration the pledged to each other "our Lives, our Fortunes and our Sacred Honor." Which all of them carried out till peace with England was signed. None certainly failed their Sacred Honor, but several lost their fortunes, some certainly lost their lives and in addition also the lives of their families. Compare this with Bill Ayers and his colleagues and ilk.
This nomination is no better than one of the others suggested in the press, Sheila Jackson Lee, who during the shutdown advocated declaring martial law to protect DC and I guess the rest of the country against terrorists WWII vets. I guess she was afraid the vets in wheelchairs would run over park rangers in their violent protests? But it is not surprising for a president who has relieved 8 military flag officers of their commands. Two of them were relieved a day or two after the Benghazi "protest". They were the Admiral and General in command of the north Africa area at the time. I guess they were a bit Too Ready to send rescue teams under their command to relieve the Americans at the Consulate in Benghazi?
In response to:

Israel and the New Munich

anonymous4679 Wrote: Oct 18, 2013 10:45 PM
For those of you that have always wanted to visit the Holy Land, you need to make your visit within the next few months. NATO was basically disbanded when our new president took office almost five years ago, about the same time our new president started funding and supporting the Muslim Brotherhood. Israel Lost their American Ally as well.
The last time we and our Representatives took "advice" from Ms. Pelosi, we ended up with the ACA, AKA Obamacare. We still have not found enough congresspeople to get us out of that Train Wreck (Abortion). From the polls, it seems the only people still for the ACA are those who have been exempted/waivered/unioned, out of it. Now, how do you unbomb a bunch of people who we bomb? Are we going to need to borrow money from China to pay reperations to the remaining living survivors? I belive most of the chemical weapons from Iraq and those already held by Assad are now stockpiled in populated areas. Are we going to blow Them up, along with the inhabitants close by? Or are we just going to blow up unrelated military sites. As a far more intelligent alternative, why not take care of the real problem, Iran! Bomb or blow up ALL of their nuclear sites along with the Ayatollahs in charge, with as little damage to their imprisoned population and actually see if the remaining folks can come up with a truly democratic form of government. One advantage is we will have the aid of our ally Israel, whom we have so far treated like illegitimate stepchildren. Possibly some of our other real allies. We will also have to leave American troops and whoever will helps us in place in Iran until a truly democratic system can be set up that works, meanwhile rooting out all the Jihadist still there like we rooted out the Nazis at the end of WWII in Germany and the rest of Europe where they tried to escape to. As a side note, that action might encourage the rest of the similar nations in the area who hold WND;s to give them up for safe destruction, and or proper disposal.
Evidently even the French Socialist are starting to get a view of the abyss! Maybe their economic statistics reporting is a little more reliable than the Soviet Union, or they just don't have the advantage of the Berlin Wall. Wonder how many of their rich folks have already moved out And renounced their French Citizenship?
I've never realized there was a Civil Right for anyone to commit infanticide. And Then the same people protest executing the most heinous Murderers! Isn't that what liberals claim to hate about those nasty Christians, Hypocrisy? I don't recall any Christians claiming they were without sin, just the opposite, they have been confirming they were sinners, and depending on the Grace of God for forgiveness. Who are these folks going to be looking to, asking for forgiveness?
In response to:

America, Meet Wendy Davis

anonymous4679 Wrote: Jul 26, 2013 3:46 AM
Just another bust for the Pantheon of Baby Killers! My Sincere Congrats!!
Yep, the most inefficient route designed, goes straight through DC for the First Scam?
Yes Mr. President, the time for excuses IS over for You and Mrs. Napolitano, whether this travesty of a bill is passed or not!! It's time for You and Your DHS secretary to start enforcing our immigration laws and start deporting illegal aliens in our jails for a start! And how bout those dope dealers and users cycling in and out of jail. Then there are the Drunk and or Drug impaired Drivers, are we really going to wait for them to commit a third offense to even consider deporting them? How many manslaughter charges do the get to rack up while we're waiting for DWI/DUI convictions to hit the magic "Three"! And how many more years do we wait for that border fence to be built? Israel had finally completed theirs to keep the terrorist out, and we have to worry about the drug cartels and the sex trafficking body merchants to boot! At least the drug cartels are better armed courtesy of the ATF and Attorney General!
I find this whole thing particularly instructive, especially when viewed in light of a quote I found, (with a fair bit of difficulty, but I had seen it before and searched for it). "There's a great deal of talk about loyalty from the bottom to the top. Loyalty from the top down is even more necessary and is much less prevalent. One of the most frequently noted characteristics of great men who have remained great is loyalty to their subordinates."- General George S. Patton, Jr. It is interesting, since in addition to following all the various laws of the land, those in the U. S. Code (on the Federal Level) then all of those imposed by the state, county & municpality in which they reside and then the UCMJ (Uniformed Code of Military Justice). The UCMJ restricts Some of the freedoms that apply to Citizens of the United States. Our military personnel are specifically required to show proper and appropriate respect to those Senior to their respective rank which I am Sure the Master Sargent has Always done. But in This case, I believe he Still retains the right to his opinion of elected officials including his Commander in Chief. In this regard, he has shown him all the respect he deserves, which is very little. The Master Sgt. continues to carry out the Presidents LAWFUL orders, transmitted by the chain of command. But since the President treats his subordinates in the military as gophers or less, then how should such men & women of the military think of the President? Especially when this President has often put military folks in harms way and has often endangered them by revealing classified information, adding to the danger of their missions and also denied backup support by other military personnel who are honor bound to provide whatever support they can. Be sure to read again Gen. Patton's quote at the beginning of this comment and You be the judge!
1 - 10 Next