Being gay doesn't cause one to be respectful or disrespectful. No one agrees with another 100% but that doesn't mean in this forum that because someone is gay they are unable to contribute to the conversation with substance and passion. What exactly are your ideas? I would rather that be the starting point of the conversation instead of you are a gay person and discount being heard in this forum.

So...did you actually read the article? It was pretty accurate. The Senate hasn't passed a budget in 4 years and the President presents his late (and has yet to have one passed). The government is bloated and there isn't any actual cuts going on. They call it a cut when the amount of increase is decreased. The government will still spend more money this year than last year. What makes sense about that? I think the GOP is finally doing what is right. Finally being the operative word. Exactly what is not being paid? Haven't heard of anything that is not being paid. President can't fund more big worthless programs that won't accomplish anything? When will you actually do your own research rather than regurgitate talking points?

Yes, sorry!

Well, isn't this nice. A liberal who doesn't call names and incite ignorance...........NOT........ My guess is that you wouldn't actually be on a conservative site if not to get accurate information. Read away!

What is most pathetic is that he is calling for "NOT" selling legal fire arms...just in case Congress outlaws these sales. Taking away our liberties is what he and his kind does best. There is a petition on the wh.gov website that calls for members of Congress, if passed, to adhere to the same laws they pass for everyone else. A lot of signatures are needed within about a month. If you have a few minutes, I believe it is worth forcing the white house to respond!

It is simple math. If limiting deductions will give the democrats the "holy" revenue they seek then why do they not want it? Is it because their main goal is to try to force Republicans to go over the cliff, where they will be blamed or hurt them by trying to make them violate beliefs and pledges so they can gain seats in the mid-term? I don't trust Obama the media or Congress at this point. Just seems like if the Republicans are giving the President and Democrats the "Revenue" they seek it would not be stinking like it is now.

What are these people thinking. Hundreds of bombs from people who want to take you out and Israel is being harsh? My head just keeps spinning. Good for Israel. I would love for things to be different, but they are not. So I am not ok with speaking against a country trying to defend their people.

I agree with your statement. I think the same thing. My question is, Why isn't there some legal way to stop him? What he is doing in my opinion is illegal. The healthcare law may again go back to the House because taxes are "suppose to originate in the House, and this bill was originated in the Senate. It wouldn't get through this time without a majority in the house. Confused!

Just some background and it is something I would suggest you really read up on. Clinton ran deficits. His projected surplus would have been if the budgets and cuts in spending that had been promised under Reagan had been followed through upon. If you look at the highest levels of revenues created under Presidents you will have to go look at Calvin Coolidge, John F. Kennedy, Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush. After the tax cuts under Bush were implemented our country had the biggest increase in revenue under any president. However, Bush was also a big spender. The problem in my opinion is big government spending, not lower taxes/

You're an idot! How arrogant are you to make such a stupid assumption. You are probably being paid by someone evil to make these crazy assumption. If anything the Liberals are the ones who promote policies that harm the very people they claim to want to help. Grow up and get some education.