They have the potential to become life. How can you justify interrupting that? You, nor the "mother" have any right take away a child's life who might become someone great in this world just because they are an inconvenience. Personal responsibility people. If the mother's health is at risk then that is a different story.

Adams explained why it costs millions. Try reading it again.

I'm not sure its all about deterent. It's also about justice for the family of the victim. Plus, it costs the taxpayers way more money to have people sitting in jail for 50+ years.

Why isn't he a "Jr." instead of a 2nd? Just curious.

What has Obama done for you in the past 2 years that would make you want to vote for him again in 2012? Simple straight-forward question that requires a simple straight-forward answer. Go.

Actually, many independents who voted for Obama disapprove of him now.

So you think it is better for them to never even get the chance to experience life because they have irresponsible parents? Some pretty great people have come from poverty stricken lives...I don't think it is any of our places to tell them that they will be destined for poverty for the rest of their lives if they are born.

As a federal employee... it is not necessarily true that we wouldn't get paid for the lost income. Which is stupid, I know. But the president will have to decide whether or not we get reimbursed.

Actually, male whites are already the minority. A non-profit organization just created a scholarship fund for male whites because they (along with blacks) are now part of the minority in TX.

picky picky picky