In response to:

Anti-Second Amendment Brady Campaign Defends Eric Holder

anonymous1467 Wrote: Jun 30, 2012 4:00 PM
So inner city types and union goons should be permitted to be armed and to exercise there right to employ the use of arms; but not Republicans? That doesn't sound right?
THE_independent Wrote: Jun 30, 2012 4:04 PM
"That doesn't sound right? "

your post doesn't sound right!

"inner city types and union goons" not a bit prejudiced are you?
loisoo01 Wrote: Jun 30, 2012 4:05 PM
I'm guessing anonymous doesn't really travel.
Lance61 Wrote: Jun 30, 2012 4:13 PM
Correct. Shoulda said "folks livin' in the inner city areas, and c0mmunists".

I am not one who would agree, if those folks are legal American citizens, I only believe the point would have been made clearer.

If Operation Fast and Furious wasn't about pushing for more gun control, then why is the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, a group with strong oppositions to the Second Amendment, coming to Attorney General Eric Holder's defense? Brady Campaign President Dan Gross issued a statement slamming Chairman of the House Oversight Committee and Speaker John Boehner for moving forward to hold Holder in criminal and civil contempt of Congress this week. Gross did not mention the vote was bipartisan, 17 Democrats voted for criminal contempt and 21 voted for civil contempt.

“As House Oversight Chairman Darrell...