The Constitution is a granting document of power from the people to form a government, and that what ever power the people did not grant, they inherently reserve to themselves. To the view the Constitution in any manner that places government in a position to grant power or rights provided no limits on what government can do, since it was designed to specifically to say ONLY what they can do, and NOT what the people can’t do. Basing opinion off of opinion may lead to the compounding of flawed rulings until will eventually lead to rulings that may be very similar to the most previous court opinion, but after time and numerous opinions will no longer be recognizable to original meaning of the Constitution provision in question.
by Michael F. Cannon and Jonathan H. Adler
A president who says “I haven’t raised taxes” has authorized his Internal Revenue Service issue a “final rule” that will illegally tax some 12 million individuals, plus large employers, in as many as 40 states beginning in 2014. Oklahoma’s attorney general has asked a federal court to block this rule. Members of Congress have introduced legislation in both the House and the Senate to quash it.
At first glance, it might not seem that the IRS is up to anything...
May lead to?? That's a wee bit of an understatement, isn't it?