In response to:
Ed Schultz is right.... there has never been a case of an armed civilian stopping a mass shooting. That's because every mass shooting has been in a gun free zone and there were no armed civilians around to stop the shooting. The whole premise of the analysis of those mass shootings is flawed before you even began to examine the first shooting.
This is another example of Progressive science -- start with a conclusion as FACT, and then search for "facts" to try and prop it up.
Yeah, he really said this:
Where did he get this idea? Jack Coleman over at NewsBusters thinks the claim originated from a Mother Jones article written in the wake of the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting, but Schultz doesn’t source the statement. The Mother Jones report states: “In the wake of the slaughters this summer at a Colorado movie theater and a Sikh temple in Wisconsin, we set out to track mass shootings in the United States over the last 30 years. We identified and analyzed...
Get real..... guns are out there and criminals won't give up theirs. So unless YOU personally plan to stand between the victim and the criminal, you have no say in how anyone chooses to lawfully protect themselves.
And there was never a robbery when money and goods weren't present. let's get rid of the right to hold property.