wsmith-84... I fixed your typo for you.... It will be exquisite to watch nutters fumble all over themselves in dismay if any of the 4 left-wing activist justices side against the PPACA.

I suggest you get some sleep and read again when you aren't so tired.

Mona Charen did nothing of the sort. She passed on the facts as reported by those who do have PhDs, advanced training in psycology and/or clinical, medical education and/or expertise. John3138 is a man(woman?) who has no training in discerning facts and logically and truthfully conveying such facts to others. Why would anyone give his (her?) thoughts and beliefs any more credence than those of a random person interviewed on the street?

Many Union leaders have salaries in the mid to high 6 figure range, all coming from the dues paid by union members. In the meantime, the number of union members joining the "bread lines" continues to grow. To sustain their own salaries, Union leadership requires new membership to pour in more money. In short, Union leaders are living atop a Ponzi scheme. Didn't Madoff go to jail for living atop a Ponzi scheme?

With regard to equal treatment and marriage, everyone already has the right to marry in this country. You know that and so do LGBTs. Why can't you just come out and be honest about what it is you really want.... to redefine marriage? The reason you and LGBTs have to resort to dishonesty and lies is if they approached the issue from the truth, they would reveal the fact the entire foundation of their position is a bed of lies.

I do see..... you said the Judge was wrong implying the ruling is not in line with your beliefs. (All I did was a little LIBERAL EXTRAPOLATION, which apparently you didn't see.) As for the reference, my experience is those who seek truth are will to work for it. Liberals prefer everything be spoon feed. If you want the truth, spend a little time looking.... it's not that hard to find (p.s. It only took my five minutes to find it on the Internet.) Good luck to you.

I see, Judges are only correct when it fits the Liberal/Marxist mold. As for no Justice claiming atheism being a religion of its own, spend some time digging into the writings of Chief Justice Rehnquest.....unless you fear being proven wrong.

A question to all the Athiest Zealots out there.... Why did it take from 1791 to 1947 (156 years0 before some judge/court suddently realized we had been doing it wrong from the very begining (to include Thomas Jefferson who as President signed into law several budgets which gave federal dollars to not just religious institutions, but Christian institutions)?

All religions have one thing in common. They provide the moral fondation on which a person or society builds all else. So congratulations, you've seen the light. The question now is who's religion is the government going to foist on socieity? Right now it's Secular Humanism. Since Liberials like to profess that Judges are the final arbitors, you need to climb on the band wagon. After all, it was a Supreme Court Chief Justice which stated Atheism was in fact a religion of its own.

...and you would rather HIlter won WWII if it meant the defeat of the US. It is the US Soldier that protects your right to be ungrateful.