In response to:

Todd Akin Was Never Accused of Rape -- Unlike Bill Clinton

Anominus Wrote: Aug 23, 2012 12:56 PM
Biology isn't simple, especially when you consider all the hormonal reactions, but Akin is correct. I have given citations to prove that fact in my 12:31 and 12:38 posts below this one.
Mother of 4 -- the original Wrote: Aug 23, 2012 3:10 PM
There is indeed such a thing as "illegitimate" rape.

That is the rape that never actually occurred because the women never actually said "NO!" but, rather, retroactively decided that she regretted being seduced and thus claimed rape to either get herself out of trouble or the man into trouble.
shubi_ Wrote: Aug 23, 2012 1:28 PM
He gave science citations, you moronic twit! Yeah I am talking to you skyfag.
Anominus Wrote: Aug 23, 2012 1:20 PM
There are indeed "illegitimate" cases of rape based on false accusations, though if the allegations are true, then all rape is forcible. Do the research regarding the biological portion, then come back and try again.
skytroop6 Wrote: Aug 23, 2012 1:10 PM
Your citations? They are worthless unless you too believe there is such a thing as illegitimate rape and forcible rape.
Which is worse, Rep. Todd Akin's, R-Mo., ignorance about human anatomy -- or the way Republicans jump, run and hide when the Democrat-media complex decides they should?

Akin is the Republican candidate for a crucial Senate seat in Missouri. In an interview, he said that he believed that pregnancy following an act of rape is "really rare -- if it's a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut the whole thing down."

Incredibly dumb. The married father of six, including two daughters, apologized the next day and then recorded an ad apologizing yet...