In response to:

Lots Of Children, But No Fathers Or Mothers

Anominus Wrote: Oct 10, 2012 1:02 PM
The difference is that we actually do mean to protect the family and children. We mean to protect them by ensuring that traditional marriage, the single, best way to protect, provide for and raise children, is encouraged and promoted, while the so-called "alternative lifestyles" are shown to be flawed at best and dangerous at worst. The leftists don't actually care about children, a fact proven by their support for abortion, their desire to subject children to the innately flawed parental authority of homosexual partners, and frequent use of them as political pawns. The claim that removing mother and father from the list of legal terms will somehow protect the adopted children of homosexual couples from "bullying" is complete bunk.

France plans to ban the words “mother” and “father” in legal language concerning marriage in that country.

The goal is to further communicate the message that “marriage is a union of two people, of different or the same gender.” But the result is certain to be more children without mothers or without fathers in the home.

And here’s the question—how long will it be before someone attempts to duplicate this proposed ban in America

It is, after all, exactly where many are headed in seeking to live their lives their own way, without any interference from church or state,...