Previous 11 - 20 Next
The fact that religion is being used as a reason to deny funding to a club is quite obviously contradictory to the 1st Amendment. If a school can't fund one club, then it shouldn't be funding ANY club.
I think it’s hilarious you believe that children need to learn about their supposed sexual attractions, but refer to the discussion of “gender” as “lunacy.” That “lunacy” is the very foundation of the arguments used by those who favor homosodomy – it’s all about feelings. There’s no science to back any of it up, just emotion. Of course, these are the same imbeciles who believe that men who abandon their wives to "marry" their boyfriends are being "honest" after a lifetime of "repressing their identities," while at the same time condemning longtime homodosodomites who abandon that lifestyle as "traitors and liars" (assuming they don't just deny that occurrence, altogether). The fact that those who engage in homosodomy need special programs to protect them from “bullying,” something that all children face for one reason or another, speaks volumes as to the mental weakness underlying that behavior. It makes as much sense to include pedophilia, necrophilia and bestiality in "history, social studies, literature, political science, health, art history and sex-education curricula" as it does to include homosodomy - in a word, none. The only class that should occasionally be addressing any one of those topics would be health, particularly in how to avoid the consequences brought about by these dangerous, unhealthy paraphilias. It doesn’t even mention a lengthy discussion, as the obvious answer is simply to avoid the behaviors in the first place. The primary reason that pro-homosodomite “resources” aren’t being used more is that there are still enough people with common sense to recognize that we shouldn’t be subverting the human norm –heterosexuality- for the sake of a tiny group of perverted buffoons who can’t understand their own biological functions.
I call you "tinpot" because your posts generally amount to the same value as the noise generated when someone is banging on a tinpot. I do understand the law - it's pretty straightforward in its blatant unconstitutionality. You claim to disagree with the law, but you certainly approve of those who put the law in place and who benefit from the law. This sort of thing is the modus operandi of the homosodomites. The states don't have a valid reason. The "public accommodation" argument is meaningless, as it essentially covers EVERYTHING (including "private clubs" but they apparently called in a favor with the judiciary and had an exclusion tailored just for them). Once again, the "valid reason" given by the state amounts to nothing more than "hurt feelings" on the part of homosodomites. There is no demonstrable harm (beyond hurt feelings) in being refused service, but there IS demonstrable harm in being compelled to serve (act of slavery). You can toss up straw men and red herrings all you like, but that is the underlying reality. Intelligent people recognize the stupidity of trying to bend society to fit the vision of perverts, like the homosodomites. Obviously, you are not an intelligent person in that regard.
"There must be a reason for a law denying something" Obviously not, Tinpot, or did you conveniently forget that this article was written about a bunch of perverts who made laws which deny a private business' right to refuse service based on the fact that their "feelings were hurt" that there are people in the community who want nothing to do with them?
"Two women in Alabama could not get married to each other.... You may not have been aware that is what we are discussing" And yet, they were still free to get married according to the same laws as everyone else. Hence, NO DISCRIMINATION.
HoG, you are such a buffoon. The precedent of "allowing" individuals to refuse service was set long ago - at one point it was called freedom and is perfectly compatible with the concepts of our Constitution. The "private club" reasoning is nothing but ridiculous gibberish on the part of judges looking to preserve their country clubs from the "common riffraff." Unless you are seeking emergency treatment from a hospital, you have no right to compel service from another individual or business. If you don't like how a person or business treats you, you leave. Likewise, if a business owner doesn't like you, for whatever reason (appearance, smell, sound of your voice, attitude, or even just grouchiness), he has every right to give you the boot from his PRIVATE PROPERTY. In supporting the "right" of homosodomites to enslave private business owners, you demonstrate your utter contempt for freedom in all its forms.
It is already illegal for hospitals to refuse to provide life-saving / emergency treatment.
"You either can justify that discrimination as being necessary, or it is unconstitutional.. Simple" You would first have to prove that discrimination exists. Homosodomites have always been free to get married according to the same standards as everyone else. The reality is simply that they have chosen to not get married. They are comparable to people who refuse to get a drivers license, yet believe they have a right to sail a boat down the highway, all the while demanding the tolerance of others, yet offering none themselves.
In response to:

Anti-Vaccine Fanatics Kill

Anominus Wrote: Feb 04, 2015 4:47 PM
Possibly, but I think that will be very difficult to measure, as I suspect that autism is caused by many different factors, rather than just one. With the hundreds of thousands of "medications" out there, and the growing reliance on them, not to mention the difficulty of determining all the effects of certain combinations of drugs, I suspect the number of cases of autism will continue to grow.
In response to:

Anti-Vaccine Fanatics Kill

Anominus Wrote: Feb 04, 2015 4:27 PM
Thiomersal / Thimerosal is a compound containing mercury which was / is used as a preservative in many vaccines. Theoretically, it is much less commonly-used than it was a decade ago, but it was found to be toxic to human brain cells, even with low levels of exposure, such as that used in vaccines for infants. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21350943
In response to:

Anti-Vaccine Fanatics Kill

Anominus Wrote: Feb 04, 2015 4:20 PM
Do you know what kills even more people than refusing vaccination? Open border, pro-amnesty RINOs! Measles was nearly eradicated in this country, but is still quite common across our southern border. I think it’s hilarious that we are supposed to believe that this “mysterious infection” is spreading out from Disneyland, rather than from those thousands of “unaccompanied minors” our government invited into our country last year. They came into our country bearing a wide variety of diseases and parasites, and, after having been so handily distributed amongst the general populace (public schools, hospitals, public transport, etc.) it only makes sense that our citizens are going to suffer for it. So next time you are forced to vaccinate yourself or your family, just remember to “thank” our traitorous politicians – Bush, McCain, Romney, Obama, and so on - and the hordes of illegal invaders. “Thank” them for the wonderful threats of scabies, tuberculosis, enterovirus, measles, hepatitis, MRSA and so many other diseases!
Previous 11 - 20 Next