1 - 10 Next
So much naivety and falsehood today, Davie! Just because something is discredited, it doesn't mean there won't be useful idiots who will continue to serve that cause - you lefties are prime examples of that fact. Of course, the reality is that communism never truly died, it just went to ground and mutated, taking its current form within the "progressive" left. Deny it all you like, but there's no truth in your words. Socialism (and communism, for that matter) and atheism are deeply connected. They are entwined by their infinite contempt for the greater value of humanity - hatred of the individual and hatred of mankind's greater purpose. Atheism is not a "non-belief" (no such thing), but a specific belief that there is no God. "Corruption of hearts and minds? One man's corruption is another man's enlightenment." That's "true" in the same regard that one man's feces are another man's delicacy. Of course, it doesn't change the fact that it's still feces that you are eating, Davie.
That's a lie, and you know it, Davie. The homosodomites are out to destroy anything which opposes them, most especially Christianity, or at least any denomination which actually follows the teachings of Christ faithfully. Also, it's not a majority of American Catholics that disagree with God's laws against homosodomy, just that outspoken, rebellious minority that the media loves to interview in an attempt to make their ideology "credible." I'm not surprised that you so freely buy into such a predictable lie.
SA certainly maintains the intellect of organisms in primordial soup, clear evidence of his evolutionary heritage.
Religion doesn't even enter into this debate, numbnuts. It was a matter of being able to freely discuss a heated political topic from both sides, rather than being forced to submit to a lopsided monologue being preached in support only. If anything truly "poisons everything," it would be the homosodomites you are so keen on supporting. They literally infect, pervert and destroy everything they get their slimy hands on.
In response to:

Black Abortions Matter

Anominus Wrote: Dec 18, 2014 1:36 PM
"Ginsberg is a liberal, judicial activist - just what we don't need on the SC. But she is not guilty this time." By being a liberal, judicial activist, Ginsberg affirms her position on "eugenics" by default. Besides which, what is abortion if not eugenics - the culling (killing) of the "undesirable"?
In response to:

Black Abortions Matter

Anominus Wrote: Dec 18, 2014 11:32 AM
Sanger embraced the same eugenic ideology as Adolph Hitler, and used the "educated black leadership" (elites) to push her program on the uneducated masses. She defined all "people of color" as "human weeds" to be exterminated: "we do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negr0 population and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members."
In response to:

Black Abortions Matter

Anominus Wrote: Dec 18, 2014 11:07 AM
You might have a point if blacks didn't have higher fertility and birth rates than whites. You also don't appear to consider that in 1865, there was no immigration from African nations, whereas today, this is the mainstay for keeping the black population in a "holding position."
In response to:

Black Abortions Matter

Anominus Wrote: Dec 18, 2014 10:44 AM
@ HOG: So long as we are arbitrarily applying irrelevant, unprovable, variable "standards" with regards to the rights of certain individuals, I will debate Michael Brown's personhood. From his behavior, he was just another mad dog, waiting to be put down - an animal that was never "housebroken" to behave within society, a threat to the people around him. He was obviously lacking in mental capacity to understand that one does not assault police and expect to get away with it unharmed. There was nothing egregious about Brown's death - this is the common and regular end for violent street thugs. A "fetus" (Latin word for "baby" or "offspring") functions at about the same level as a sleeping child. If you were to pump carbon monoxide into a room someone is sleeping in, they wouldn't be thinking at a relevant level, and wouldn't suffer - does that somehow make them less human? It is logically inconsistent to defend the right to life of someone who denies the rights of innocent individuals, most especially with regards to the right to life.
In response to:

Black Abortions Matter

Anominus Wrote: Dec 18, 2014 10:21 AM
@ Rich D. - Just for your information, involuntary manslaughter is the unintentional killing of another human during the commission of a criminal act or due to criminal negligence. Either way, to be convicted of involuntary manslaughter, one must be engaged in criminal behavior. This has all been addressed with HOG in the past, but he just can't (won't) admit that his argument fails.
Are you willing to turn a blind eye to the devil and hope nothing bad will happen if you just sit idle?
1 - 10 Next