1 - 10 Next
I'd love to know what those "hateful words" were... Baking a cake has as much to do with free speech as decorating a cake. Private businesses must have the right to refuse service for any reason, or become a new slave class.
If women are people, then they should start acting like it.
Cowardly scumbags - they are more concerned with being popular than doing what's right.
In response to:

The Last Taboo

Anominus Wrote: Jan 21, 2015 5:13 PM
Of course it is, Ken! A group smaller than the homosodomites won't be able to raise enough votes to curry favor with the democrats...
In response to:

The Last Taboo

Anominus Wrote: Jan 21, 2015 5:11 PM
Government *does* decide moral issues. Insofar as government is composed of The People, yes it should do so.
In response to:

The Last Taboo

Anominus Wrote: Jan 21, 2015 5:06 PM
Nonsense. If religion has authority over the individual, and the individual has authority over the government (directly, by election, or indirectly, by representation), then there is most assuredly a relationship between religion and government. And rightly so, particularly when you consider that religion is most often the root of the individual's morals. You are forgetting that not all incestuous relations (sterilization, birth control, mother / daughter; father / son) can produce children at all. Does that make them acceptable? Besides which, it was determined that children are irrelevant with regards to the legal issue of marriage. From the standpoint of the lefties, "damaged children" should simply be destroyed before they are born. "Consent" is nothing but a social / legal construct with roots in religious tradition (free will). The perverts have demonstrated just what they think of such things, so in reality, it only matters until they find a judge who says it doesn't! There have long been lobbies in favor of conferring special rights to each of the other paraphilias, so it is a willful ignorance to believe that incest, polygamy, bestiality and pedophilia will not follow the same path as homosodomy.
In response to:

The Last Taboo

Anominus Wrote: Jan 21, 2015 4:51 PM
Wrong. Homosodomite "marriage" was legalized because a special interest group, aligned with leftist political interests (undermining the individual's independence), demanded it, consequences be damned! The perverts generally failed to accomplish their goal by truly legal means (voting), so they found crooked judges and arrogant politicians to do the job for them. Many good things are "shredded and mocked in legal cases," but what do you expect when a black-robed "godling" sets himself above the law and enforces his own whims? The fact that homosodomites cannot produce children within their unions, nor provide any sort of good role model for children unfortunate enough to be in their care speaks volumes. What you twits willfully ignore is this fact - society saw fit to award privileges to heterosexual marriage due to its beneficial effects on society. Society saw no similar benefits in homosodomite unions and chose to not bestow any benefits on it. That is the fact. That is the basic criteria of voting. You do not have any right to demand privilege from society.
Or, maybe you are about as "faithful" a moslem as Nancy Pelosi is a "faithful" Catholic? I have no need to "bash" moslems - they do a great job of that themselves. Mohammed established islam through acts of violence. Islam remains influential, historically and in the modern day, only due to acts of violence. There is no positive aspect of islam.
Technically, it's "Thou shalt not commit murder." Murder is the unjustifiable killing of another person.
Moslems may have the "right" to live and worship in this country, but that doesn't mean we should welcome, encourage or emulate them in any way. There is nothing worthwhile about islam, other than a lesson in "how not to behave."
1 - 10 Next