1 - 10 Next
Probably the same number of parents who want their little girl to share a tent with a teenage boy on camping trips.
In response to:

On Using Parents of Murdered Children

Anominus Wrote: 8 hours ago (8:49 PM)
There can be no greater example of hatred than your contempt for the right of law-abiding citizens to arm themselves for the sake of their own defense, both from criminals and from the threat of an overbearing government. This also reveals your deep set anger that anyone would dare to believe that they actually possess such a right (regardless of the fact that it is clear as day in the Constitution). Your demands for more restrictions on firearms will do nothing but ensure that more women, and anyone else at a physical disadvantage versus their attackers, are unable to defend themselves. You should be made to understand that their deaths and injuries fall squarely on your head. Once again, I recognize this world for what it is - you keep living in your little fantasy world. Squeeze your eyes closed, cover your ears and scream "La la la" at the top of your lungs to keep reality at bay, little pig.
"Scouting has nothing to do with sex." Thanks to the perverts and their enablers, it does now! This should come as no surprise, given that these people define themselves solely by their preferred "bedroom behavior."
Insane, but not really surprising, considering the general insanity of the world. Now the BSA can start on the same path of failure and decline as the Boy Scouts of Canada did when it decided to surrender its values in favor of "Political Correctness." This is wrong on every level and the BSA national council knows it. They have abandoned their principals and should be, in turn, abandoned by those who still retain their principals. Hopefully, the local units will maintain their common sense and ignore the fools who have bowed to political pressure from a bunch of perverts and their leftist enablers! Shame!
@magst - I've been reading many of the threads in British online media, and there were indeed many who blamed the USA for the Boston Bombing. The problem here is that you are comparing a government policy (mass-immigration from enemy countries and a desire to excuse Islam no matter the cost - basically the same, foreign policy garbage in the US and UK, sadly) with the individual actions of a few citizens (the Irish immigrants who still felt political ties / sympathy for their homeland who sent funds to the IRA). The really funny thing about your gun comment is that these two terrorists were armed with a gun, despite the British ban on civilian possession of fire arms. Gun control laws only apply to those who respect the law, and as such, only limit the ability of law-abiding citizens to defend themselves from criminals (who ignore the law, anyway).
In response to:

On Using Parents of Murdered Children

Anominus Wrote: 15 hours ago (1:40 PM)
Open your eyes and look around, little pig. The world is an angry and hate-filled place. I have little doubt that there were many Jews in Germany who held the same trust in their government that you display, right up until the time Hitler started going after them. They probably believed "That could never happen here," and chose to shut their eyes to the abuses of their countrymen, in the hopes that they, themselves would be overlooked. In that, they are better than you, who would look on, wide-eyed and happy that we "angry, paranoid, hate-filled" conservatives are persecuted for our politics and for upholding our rights.
In response to:

On Using Parents of Murdered Children

Anominus Wrote: 15 hours ago (1:19 PM)
I don't give a damn what you "agree with" because you have proven, and continue to prove, yourself to be a gutless, useful idiot and blithering, leftist tool. Just because the government is not immediately engaging in violence, it doesn't mean that will remain their SOP once the populace is disarmed. Even Hitler had the common sense to wait until his countrymen had been disarmed before enacting any open violence against citizens. The only reason that you are able to turn a "blind eye" to the frequent and ongoing governmental abuses of our Constitutional rights is because of the millions of "paranoid" (watchful, aware and prepared) people like me. Be happy in your sty, oblivious, little pig - just don't be surprised when the farmer starts demanding bacon.
In response to:

On Using Parents of Murdered Children

Anominus Wrote: 17 hours ago (11:12 AM)
"I'd pay money to watch you try to fight off the U.S army with you stash of weapons." I'm sure you would love to see our government turn the military against conservatives who still believe in the Constitution and the individual freedoms it guarantees. That's pretty typical of leftist scumbags, like yourself. I wonder just how many groups you will silently (and gleefully) watch the government take away before figuring out that they will soon come for you as well? "I'm sure that the government would just love to enslave you ...but...they're afraid of your stash of weapons." You are just so incredibly stupid. The government does not fear the individual and his weapons - it fears the armed citizenry (the true purpose and intent of the 2nd Amendment), about 55 million households of us, the amount of damage that would be done if it chose to engage in violence against us, and the huge cost of such an endeavor (how we actually won the War for Independence). Of course, there is also the great chance that the military - still a mostly conservative organization, despite the continued attempts by the left to corrupt it through the leadership - would be unwilling to engage in violence against their fellow citizens for the sake of government aggression.
In response to:

On Using Parents of Murdered Children

Anominus Wrote: May 22, 2013 6:20 PM
"When I made my original post I thought about adding "in America" to the end of the sentence about mass murders not involving guns but figured that was already understood. Yes, I'll concede that in many other countries the nut jobs use whatever they can get their hands on to kill others." In all countries, the "nut jobs use whatever they can get their hands on." If you take away the guns in this country, just as they have in England and Australia, you can expect the same increase in violent crimes using other weapons, and even less people being able to defend themselves. The similarity, no matter where you go, is that where ever guns are "legally banned" from civilian possession, THAT is where the majority of massacres will happen.
In response to:

On Using Parents of Murdered Children

Anominus Wrote: May 22, 2013 6:17 PM
Yes, it's a totally baseless emotion to suspect the government of being perfectly willing and capable of violating Constitutional rights... There has never before been an example of a government taking advantage of the citizenry after their ability to defend themselves has been stripped away. No polls have ever been misconstrued or simply tampered with to "mean" something entirely different from what was asked, particularly not to prop up an agenda of a corrupt administration. You are a fool if you actually believe any of that - but then again, every one of your posts simply confirms that you are indeed a fool, so you probably do believe in the "benevolence" of government. Also, I when I said "Americans will not roll over," I was not including liberal traitors in that group. I have little doubt that you will not roll over - it'll look more like spinning on the ground in your desire to surrender whatever right the government decides it needs to trample that day.
1 - 10 Next
Friday, May 24 | 04:50 AM ET
Friday, May 24 | 04:50 AM ET
Friday, May 24 | 04:50 AM ET
Friday, May 24 | 04:50 AM ET