I just checked the official web site for Kapiolani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital and according to the information there, the name of the hospital at the time of his birth should have been Kauikeolani Children's Hospital. According to the web site the name didn't change to Kapiolani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital until Kauikeolani Children's Hospital merged with Kapi‘olani Maternity Home in 1978. So how could his official long form birth certificate that was generated in 1961 have the name of the hospital that wasn't created until 1978?

I just checked the official web site for Kapiolani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital and according to the information there, the name of the hospital at the time of his birth should have been Kauikeolani Children's Hospital. According to the web site the name didn't change to Kapiolani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital until Kauikeolani Children's Hospital merged with Kapi‘olani Maternity Home in 1978. So how could his official long form birth certificate that was generated in 1961 have the name of the hospital that wasn't created until 1978?

I just checked the official web site for Kapiolani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital and according to the information there, the name of the hospital at the time of his birth should have been Kauikeolani Children's Hospital. According to the web site the name didn't change to Kapiolani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital until Kauikeolani Children's Hospital merged with Kapi‘olani Maternity Home in 1978. So how could his official long form birth certificate that was generated in 1961 have the name of the hospital that wasn't created until 1978?

I'm not sure who is worse, the irresponsible Ann with her retarded eligibility remarks that only added to the liberals argument that everyone should get off of the President's case about the BC issue (nice going, Coulter, you idiot!) or the big-mouthed Behar, always obnoxious and foul...cannot STAND either one...loved Coulter until she blew it big time - could have used her platform but chose to stay PC on a hugely important issue.

screw them both, they both suck and neither are a friend to America or our Constitution.

Annie Hamilton

http://www.goldcoastchronicle.com/politics/why-we-should-support-israel/ By Annie Hamilton GCC/Staff August 9, 2010 Israel’s right to exist, to occupy their land is a right that is entrenched in historic relevance. Israel existed right up until the time of the Roman Empire. When the Romans conquered the land, Jews were permitted to live there. There are two periods where they were effectively forced from their property, the first time in 70 A.D. and the other sometime around 135 A.D. There’s always been a Jewish presence in Israel and for hundreds of years; the Middle East was easily the most peaceful part of the World. Some have forgotten that Rahm Emanuel arranged meetings between Yitzhak Rabin and Yasir Arafat back in the...

Diana, I always enjoy your articles so much. And this is 100 % correct, it's NOT surrender, it's simply regrouping until an efficient strategy can be implemented. without this in place, it is impossible and that is NOT a good position for our troops. They are there without a properly funded budget, we're below the levels of WWII now with the latest cuts, they're belittled by the white house and administration and it's a region that is the finance end for al Qaeda, supplying 80 % of heroin to Europe and 70 % to the rest of the World. no way is it surrender, it's smart...we NEED to be thinking about the men and women of this country first, who have put their lives on the line in order to try to help this region - and if we know it's not...