In response to:

Obama's Angels

Anne_1 Wrote: May 06, 2012 9:16 AM
Giles: "Whatever happened to the Charlie’s Angels type of girls our culture used to uphold—independent, sharp, solid and smart women? " Oh, we're here! We're Conservatives, and just for starters, we're pretty annoyed with Obozo's insult, assuming that WE can't take care of ourselves, thank you.
Carlos7 Wrote: May 06, 2012 9:22 AM

Conservative women are the most underrepresented Americans; thanks to MSM and Hollywood Democrats.
Robert375 Wrote: May 06, 2012 10:27 AM
Carlos7: Of course they dont. They work hard, on the job or raising kids at home. They don't burn any underwear. They dont get knocked up and have a government paid abortion. They
pay for their own place in the world. They stand for the family values of the Judeo/Cristian culture that is the culture of the United States.
I guess they just aren't progressive enough to make a movie about, huh?

Independent sassy ladies, make way for Obama’s government dependent gal … Julia! For the double X chromosomes who’ve yet to meet Julia, she’s Obama’s dream girl: a needy chick who’s beholden to big government from her wee little diapers to her ginormous adult Depends. And I thought conservatives hated women?

Now, before I continue to bash Obama’s dreamland for the ladies, who in God’s name came up with the name “Julia”? That’s way too white of a name for We the Touchy. BHO’s gang should have just named her Cassandra Caucasian or Whitney Whiteywhite.

Julia Roberts, Julia Child,...

Related Tags: feminism Julia