In response to:

Redefining Marriage Sign of a Lost Society

Andy544 Wrote: Nov 26, 2012 9:03 PM
the government of course is going to do what it wants to do, for its own reasons. If the government chooses to legalize the 'partnership' of two consenting adults of the same sex, that is the government's right. The government can also, if it wishes, rescind its laws against the practice of polygamy (altho I could never understand why a guy would want to do that to himself); or, legalize 'polyandry'; or perhaps legalize conjugal relationships with one's pet. That doesn't mean ANY of it is RIGHT, or will lead to a healthy society that is blessed by GOD. I know you folks HATE it, but HE DOES get the LAST WORD!

One significant development in the recent election was votes in four states approving same sex marriage initiatives. Until now, all previous state referenda to approve same sex marriage – 32 of them - failed.

The Wall Street Journal editorial page – a place where conservatives usually turn for intellectual capital – saw this as cause for celebration.

According to the Journal, marriage definition should come from voters, not from court orders. Americans, they argue, have “shown themselves more than capable of changing their views on gay marriage the democratic way.”

In other words, our definition of marriage should follow process, not...