In response to:

Benghazi Hearings Provide Few Answers

Andy544 Wrote: Jan 25, 2013 5:05 PM
After Clinton's belligerent and unremorseful testimony, Benghazi will remain a big white washed coverup that Congress has now, officially, participated in and 'signed off' on. The questions were 'soft ball', 'slow pitich' over the 'center of the plate' pitches that Clinton had no problem dodging (with the assistance of a large, tabbed folder she constantly referred to). Clinton was given a full four months to prepare her 'spinned' answers; she submitted to the questioning only because the GOP Senators were holding up Kerry's nomination until she did so. This charade was acted out for 'form's sake' for the American people.

One day, I hope, Hillary Clinton's Benghazi hearings will stand as testament to the smoke-and-mirrors dangerousness of U.S. foreign policy, circa 2013 -- both as executed by the executive branch of government and as weakly grasped by the legislative branch.

Did we learn who in the Obama administration concocted and/or coordinated the story about a totally imaginary video protest that was supposed to have led to the attacks in Benghazi, Libya, on 9/11/12? No.

Did we learn why the maker of the so-called anti-Islamic YouTube video clip is the only person in the world in jail for the attacks (for "parole violations")? No.

Did...