In response to:

What Kind of Action in the World Justifies a Nobel Peace Prize?

And the goshdarn Liberal Wrote: Oct 14, 2009 1:45 PM
Bush prevented a war between Pakistan and India? WOW! I guess republicans are now repudiating the MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction) doctrine in favor of diplomacy. 1984 has never been truer.

Action in the world ought to trump worlds evoked by words, especially when awarding a global prize allegedly recognizing sustained, courageous effort on behalf of peace in our world's deeply conflicted corners.

We live in an age when the farce of history precedes the tragedy, however, and even a few left-wing media and academic elites realize giving President Barack Obama a Nobel Peace Prize is utter, rollicking balderdash.

Over a lifetime of esthetic agony and ecstasy, a well-wrought world of words might deserve a Nobel Prize for Literature. Literary laureate William Faulkner made that point in his 1949 Nobel acceptance speech:...

Related Tags: Media and Culture MSNBC peace
Friday, June 01 | 04:07 AM ET
Friday, June 01 | 04:07 AM ET
Friday, June 01 | 04:07 AM ET
Friday, June 01 | 04:07 AM ET