1 - 3
In response to:

A Truly Great Phony

andrews Wrote: May 02, 2014 8:00 PM
Yes, refusal to accept the liberal concept that blacks can only succeed with government assistance is so racist. I am sure if he were to portray blacks as helpless pawns, unable to do anything without big government help, you would not be calling him a racist, even though the liberal view of minorities is likely the most racist view in modern America. (They can't enter college but for affirmative action, they cannot pass tests without being given bonus points, cannot be hired except with government aid... No, that's not racist at all!)
In response to:

Random thoughts

andrews Wrote: Mar 03, 2014 2:09 AM
Read the rest of that paragraph. He denies there were cars and SUVs, but then blames coal burning plants and pieplines (which were also lacking in the Middle Ages). It is obviously a joke. (Whether or not it was a good one is a matter of taste.) Please read the entire response before replying; knee-jerk reactions tend to make you look foolish, not the original writer. (I speak from the experience of having one of my essays posted here and getting terribly negative responses based on the first two sentences, almost entirely arguments which I rebutted later in the essay, an essay which no one bothered to read after getting absurdly enraged by my opening paragraph.)
In response to:

Standing Up Against Wealth-Shaming

andrews Wrote: Jan 29, 2014 6:25 AM
You miss the simple point that without him they would not be employees, but unemployed, thus, yes, he did help them. Or would you suggest we are better off with fewer jobs?
1 - 3