In response to:

GOP Aims to Ease Bloodshed in 2016 Primary Debates

andrew299 Wrote: Feb 06, 2013 8:36 AM
You must be joking, right? First the head of the RNC admits that his strategy was wrong and probably cost the Republicans the election. Then HE gets to appoint a blue ribbon panel of RINOs to come up with a better plan for the next time. I can't wait to see how that turns out. It is time for a new Conservative party made up of conservatives from both the old D and R parties.
VonGeist Wrote: Feb 06, 2013 11:47 AM
I agree 100% The Republic power brokers killed us in both of the last two presidential elections, THEY decide what WE want based on what THEY think we need. In reality their entire strategy is based on what is best for maintaining a Republican presence...not what is best for the country. Their greatest misconception is the stupid idea that we need to appeal to the 'moderates.'
If we could put up a legitimate conservative, a person who actually cares more about this country than their precious career, we could actually win.

"While we were playing footsie debating each other 22 times, they were spending $100 million on technology," Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus said last week, referring to his party's rigorous debate schedule in the 2012 GOP presidential primary season. The last campaign, many Republican insiders said during a recent RNC meeting, had too many debates, the result of which was a GOP arguing with itself while Democrats prepared the way for Barack Obama's victory.

There's no doubt the Republican debates produced many damaging moments for the party. There was Mitt Romney's $10,000 bet offer, which helped cement his image as...