In response to:

Ex-CIA Officer: Yes, Harsh Interrogations Helped Us Nail Bin Laden

anderson659 Wrote: Jan 04, 2013 3:27 PM
Miss diagnosed wrote about terrorists: Miss_Diagnosed Wrote: 2 minutes ago (3:23 PM) Darling, you forgot to include the federal level! Be very afraid! ---------------------------------------------------------- Absolutely, we have a president who will not utter the words Islamic terrorist, who allowed several Americans to dies in Benghazi, and then lied about it blaming a video no one had ever heard of. It is a lesson to learn, progressives are the best friends radical Islamicists have, thank you for validating that point.
Miss_Diagnosed Wrote: Jan 04, 2013 3:32 PM
Anderson, you are living a rather comfortable lifestyle due to progressivism!
anderson659 Wrote: Jan 04, 2013 3:34 PM
Miss D:

Once again you demonstrate your intellectual dwarfism by repeating indoctrination points routinely employed by ACORN to the mentally challenged recruits for the Democrat party.
Miss_Diagnosed Wrote: Jan 04, 2013 3:38 PM

Darling, I need to pour myself another drink!

This doesn't quite qualify as breaking news for those who tracked the extraordinary labyrinth of intelligence that emerged in the days following the 2011 Abbottabad raid, but the subject of US interrogation policy is again generating controversy in advance of the release of 'Zero Dark Thirty,' a film that dramatizes the bin Laden mission.  Writing in today's Washington Post, a former top CIA counter-terrorism officer sets the record straight on what measures were, and were not, employed to help bring down the world's most infamous terrorist.  Jose Rodriguez -- who made headlines last year when